Conformal maps, Möbius transformations, Schwarz lemma
Why this is asked: Know the dictionary of standard maps between disc, half-plane, strip and sector, and that Möbius maps send circles-and-lines to circles-and-lines and preserve cross-ratio.
In one sentence
Conformal means angle-preserving, which for holomorphic maps is exactly ; Möbius transformations are the maps of the sphere to itself and send circles-or-lines to circles-or-lines; and Schwarz's lemma pins down every map of the disc to itself.
Why the exam asks it
Because the geometry is concrete enough to be examined without heavy machinery, and because two facts get misremembered in predictable directions: that a line is a kind of circle once is included, and that Schwarz's lemma needs a fixed point at the origin.
The idea
Conformal maps
is conformal at if it preserves angles between curves through , including orientation. For holomorphic this happens exactly where — the derivative acts as multiplication by a complex number, which rotates by and scales by , and both operations leave angles alone.
Where conformality fails in a specific way: if vanishes to order , angles at are multiplied by . At the origin sends a right angle to a straight one.
preserves the magnitude of angles and reverses their sense; it is anticonformal, and not holomorphic. Options use it to test whether "preserves angles" was read as including orientation.
Möbius transformations
The condition is exactly what stops collapsing to a constant, and , so is conformal wherever it is defined.
Viewed on the Riemann sphere , is a bijection of the sphere: and . Composition corresponds to matrix multiplication of , so the Möbius group is — the matrix is determined up to a scalar, which is why determinant facts transfer directly.
Circles to circles. Every Möbius map is a composition of translations, rotation-scalings and the single inversion ; each of those sends circles-or-lines to circles-or-lines, so all of them do. On the sphere this is one statement, because a line is precisely a circle through . That is why can turn a line into a circle: the line passed through , the image does not.
Three points determine the map. Given distinct and , there is exactly one Möbius map sending each to . The cross-ratio is the invariant behind this, and it is preserved by every Möbius transformation.
Two maps worth knowing by name:
- Cayley, : upper half plane onto the unit disc. It sends , , — the real line onto the circle, as required.
- Disc automorphisms: every conformal bijection of the unit disc to itself is which sends to and preserves . Every one of them; there are no others.
Schwarz's lemma
holomorphic with . Then for all , and . If equality holds in either at a single interior point, with .
The proof is the maximum principle applied to , which has a removable singularity at .
The rigidity is the examinable part: one equality anywhere forces the map to be a rotation everywhere. Nothing in real analysis behaves like that.
Without the fixed point at the origin the correct statement is Schwarz–Pick, which says every holomorphic self-map of the disc is non-expanding in the hyperbolic metric, with equality exactly for the automorphisms above.
Riemann mapping theorem
Every simply connected domain that is not all of is conformally equivalent to the unit disc. Both exclusions matter: itself is not (by Liouville, a bijection would be bounded entire), and a domain with a hole is not, since conformal equivalence preserves simple connectedness.
Where intuition breaks
"Möbius maps send circles to circles and lines to lines." They mix the two. sends the line to a circle through the origin. The correct statement joins the classes: circles-or-lines to circles-or-lines.
"A conformal map preserves angles, so is conformal." It reverses orientation. Conformal includes preserving the sense of the angle, and is not holomorphic anyway.
" makes conformal, so it is injective." Locally conformal, not globally injective. again.
"Schwarz's lemma applies to any self-map of the disc." It needs . Without it, use Schwarz–Pick or pre-compose with an automorphism moving the relevant point to the origin — which is the standard trick and often the intended route.
", so is a rotation." Only if equality holds. Strict inequality says nothing beyond the bound.
"Every simply connected domain is conformally a disc." Except itself. That exclusion is not a technicality; it is Liouville.
" and are conformally equivalent because both are simply connected." No — that is exactly the excluded case, and the reason the theorem has to name it.
The exam's angle
- To build a Möbius map, use three points. Send three convenient points where they must go and the map is forced; no other conditions are needed.
- Track . Where goes, and what maps to it, usually determines the geometry — whether a line becomes a circle, and where the image is centred.
- For self-maps of the disc, normalise to first. Compose with so Schwarz applies.
- If an option asserts a bound at one point with equality, expect rigidity. Schwarz turns one equality into a complete description.
- Check simple connectedness before invoking Riemann, and remember is excluded.
The night before
- Conformal at holomorphic with . A zero of order multiplies angles by .
- is anticonformal: same angles, reversed orientation, not holomorphic.
- Möbius with ; ; group is , composition is matrix multiplication.
- Circles-or-lines to circles-or-lines. A line is a circle through .
- Three points determine a Möbius map; cross-ratio is the invariant.
- Cayley : upper half plane disc.
- Disc automorphisms are exactly .
- Schwarz: , , ; equality anywhere forces a rotation. Without the fixed point, Schwarz–Pick.
- Riemann mapping: simply connected and not conformally a disc.
See it move
The trap here
“ and the unit disc are biholomorphic (both are simply connected)” — false
Liouville's theorem
A biholomorphism 𝔻 would invert to a bounded entire function. is the sole exception in the Riemann mapping theorem.
Check yourself
The image of the upper half-plane under the map w = (z − i)/(z + i) is
More in Zeros and Mappings
Take it further
- The mistake this prevents: execution slip → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- The mistake this prevents: standard counterexample → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- Previous-year questions set on this — every option and the answer, free:June 2025 · Part BDecember 2025 · Part CJune 2025 · Part CDecember 2024 · Part BJune 2024 · Part BDecember 2024 · Part C
Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.
Next: Subgroups, cosets, Lagrange, cyclic groups
Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.
Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 2