has no convergent subsequence since ‖‖ . Heine–Borel is only.
Counterexample bank
Part C is won by knowing which tempting claims are false. 148 counterexamples; 85 free. The rest come with the Notes pack.
#1 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Closed and bounded ⇒ compact” — false
Counterexample: Closed unit ball in ℓ² (or in C[0,1] with sup norm)
#2 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Bounded ⇒ totally bounded” — false
Counterexample: ℝ with the discrete metric
Everything is within distance 1, but no finite set of balls of radius ½ covers it.
#3 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Completeness is a topological property” — false
Counterexample: (0,1) and ℝ
Homeomorphic, but is complete and (0,1) is not (1/n is Cauchy).
#4 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Connected ⇒ path-connected” — false
Counterexample: Topologist's sine curve {(x, sin 1/x) : 0 < x ≤ 1} ∪ {0}×[−1,1]
Connected as the closure of a connected set; no path reaches the segment.
#5 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Continuity and Differentiation
“Continuous on a bounded interval ⇒ bounded” — false
Counterexample: f(x) = 1/x on (0,1)
Needs a compact (closed) domain.
#6 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Continuity and Differentiation
“Uniformly continuous ⇒ Lipschitz” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#7 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Continuity and Differentiation
“Differentiable ⇒ continuously differentiable” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#8 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Sequences and Series of Functions
“Pointwise limit of continuous functions is continuous” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#9 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › The Real Line
“Σaₙ convergent ⇒ Σaₙ² convergent” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#10 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › The Real Line
“aₙ → 0 ⇒ Σaₙ converges” — false
Counterexample: Harmonic series Σ1/n
#11 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Integration
“Riemann integrable ⇒ continuous almost everywhere fails for… (i.e. 'bounded ⇒ integrable')” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#12 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Lebesgue Measure and Integration
“A subset of ℝ with measure zero is countable” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#13 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Topology
“Every subspace of a separable metric space is separable — fails for general topological spaces” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#14 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Eigenvalues and Canonical Forms
“Same characteristic polynomial ⇒ similar” — false
Counterexample: 0 matrix and [[0,1],[0,0]]
Both have char poly , different minimal polynomials (x vs .
#15 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Eigenvalues and Canonical Forms
“Diagonalisable ⇒ invertible” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#16 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Eigenvalues and Canonical Forms
“Real matrix with real eigenvalues is diagonalisable” — false
Counterexample: [[1,1],[0,1]]
Eigenvalue 1 with geometric multiplicity 1 < algebraic 2.
#17 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Determinants and Matrix Tricks
“AB = I ⇒ BA = I for all matrices” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#18 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Inner Product Spaces and Forms
“Every real symmetric matrix is positive definite if det > 0” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#19 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“Converse of Lagrange: d | |G| ⇒ subgroup of order d” — false
Counterexample: A₄ has no subgroup of order 6
#20 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“H ⊴ K and K ⊴ G ⇒ H ⊴ G” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#21 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“Every group of order p² is cyclic” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#22 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Rings and Fields
“Every integral domain is a UFD” — false
Counterexample: ℤ[√−5]: 6 = 2·3 = (1+√−5)(1−√−5)
#23 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Rings and Fields
“Every UFD is a PID” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#24 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Rings and Fields
“Every PID is Euclidean” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#25 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Rings and Fields
“Irreducible over ℤ ⇒ irreducible mod every prime” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#26 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Cauchy Theory
“Bounded real part ⇒ entire function is constant — fails if only |f| is bounded on a half-plane” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#27 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Singularities and Residues
“Zeros of a non-constant analytic function can accumulate inside the domain” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#28 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Singularities and Residues
“|f| bounded near an isolated singularity ⇒ pole” — false
Counterexample: f(z) = sin(z)/z at 0
Bounded ⇒ removable (Riemann). Poles have |f| .
#29 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Ordinary Differential Equations
“Every IVP has a unique solution” — false
Counterexample: y′ = y^{1/3}, y(0) = 0
Not Lipschitz at 0; y ≡ 0 and y = both solve it.
#30 · Probability & Statistics › Limit Theorems and Markov Chains
“Convergence in probability ⇒ almost sure convergence” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#31 · Probability & Statistics › Probability
“Uncorrelated ⇒ independent” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#32 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › The Real Line
“Cesàro means converge ⇒ the sequence converges” — false
Counterexample: aₙ = (−1)ⁿ
Partial averages → 0, sequence diverges.
#33 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › The Real Line
“aₙ^{1/n} → L ⇒ aₙ₊₁/aₙ → L” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#34 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › The Real Line
“limsup(aₙ + bₙ) = limsup aₙ + limsup bₙ” — false
Counterexample: aₙ = (−1)ⁿ, bₙ = (−1)ⁿ⁺¹
, so the left side is 0 while the right side is 1 + 1 = 2.
#35 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › The Real Line
“Σaₙ converges ⇒ Σaₙ² converges” — false
Counterexample: aₙ = (−1)ⁿ/√n
Alternating series converges; squares give the harmonic series.
#36 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › The Real Line
“Ratio test inconclusive ⇒ root test inconclusive” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#37 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Continuity and Differentiation
“Bounded and continuous on ℝ ⇒ uniformly continuous” — false
Counterexample: f(x) = sin(x²)
satisfy || → 0 while || = 1.
#38 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Continuity and Differentiation
“Product of uniformly continuous functions is uniformly continuous” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#39 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Eigenvalues and Canonical Forms
“Same characteristic and minimal polynomial ⇒ similar” — false
Counterexample: 4×4 nilpotent matrices with Jordan blocks of sizes {2, 2} and {2, 1, 1}
Both have and , but different numbers of blocks (ranks 2 vs 1).
#40 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Vector Spaces and Linear Maps
“AB and BA have the same minimal polynomial” — false
Counterexample: A = [[0,1],[0,0]], B = [[0,0],[0,1]]
AB = A has minimal polynomial , BA = 0 has x. The characteristic polynomials do agree.
#41 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Eigenvalues and Canonical Forms
“Commuting matrices are simultaneously diagonalisable” — false
Counterexample: A = B = [[0,1],[0,0]]
They commute but neither is diagonalisable. Need each to be diagonalisable first.
#42 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Eigenvalues and Canonical Forms
“Real matrix diagonalisable over ℂ ⇒ diagonalisable over ℝ” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#43 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Continuity and Differentiation
“If lim f/g exists (0/0 form) then lim f′/g′ exists” — false
Counterexample: f(x) = x² sin(1/x), g(x) = x as x → 0
f/g = x sin(1/x) → 0, but f′/g′ = 2x sin(1/x) − cos(1/x) has no limit. L'Hôpital goes one way only.
#44 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Continuity and Differentiation
“f′(x₀) = 0 and f′ changes sign nowhere near x₀ ⇒ f is constant near x₀” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#45 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Integration
“|f| Riemann integrable ⇒ f Riemann integrable” — false
Counterexample: f = 1 on ℚ ∩ [0,1], −1 elsewhere
|f| ≡ 1 is integrable; f is discontinuous everywhere.
#46 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Integration
“A composition of Riemann integrable functions is Riemann integrable” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#47 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Sequences and Series of Functions
“fₙ → f uniformly ⇒ fₙ′ → f′” — false
Counterexample: fₙ(x) = sin(nx)/n
Converges uniformly to 0, derivatives cos(nx) do not converge.
#48 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Sequences and Series of Functions
“fₙ → 0 pointwise on [0,1] ⇒ ∫₀¹ fₙ → 0” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#49 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Sequences and Series of Functions
“Σaₙxⁿ → L as x → 1⁻ ⇒ Σaₙ = L” — false
Counterexample: Σ(−1)ⁿxⁿ = 1/(1 + x) → 1/2
diverges. Abel's theorem has no converse without a Tauberian condition.
#50 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Sequences and Series of Functions
“A power series converges uniformly on its open disc of convergence” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#51 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“d(Tx, Ty) < d(x, y) for all x ≠ y on a complete space ⇒ T has a fixed point” — false
Counterexample: T(x) = x + 1/x on [1, ∞)
Distances strictly decrease but no contraction constant k < 1 exists; no fixed point.
#52 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“A countable dense subset of ℝ can be a G_δ” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#53 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Closure of a path-connected set is path-connected” — false
Counterexample: Graph of sin(1/x) on (0,1]
Its closure is the topologist's sine curve.
#54 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Path components are closed” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#55 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“If d divides |G| then G has a subgroup of order d” — false
Counterexample: A₄ has order 12 but no subgroup of order 6
#56 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“o(ab) is finite whenever o(a) and o(b) are” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#57 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“H ⊴ K and K ⊴ G imply H ⊴ G” — false
Counterexample: ⟨(12)(34)⟩ ⊴ V₄ ⊴ A₄
Conjugating (12)(34) by the 3-cycle (123) gives (13)(24) ∉ ⟨(12)(34)⟩.
#58 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“If every subgroup of G is normal then G is abelian” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#59 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“Aₙ is simple for every n ≥ 3” — false
Counterexample: A₄ has the normal subgroup V₄ = {e, (12)(34), (13)(24), (14)(23)}
#60 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“A group with trivial centre cannot have order a prime power” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#61 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“G/Z(G) can be cyclic and non-trivial” — false
Counterexample: Impossible — if G/Z is cyclic then G is abelian, so G/Z is trivial
This 'no counterexample exists' fact is itself examined: |G/Z| is never prime.
#62 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“A group of order pq (p < q) is always cyclic” — false
Counterexample: S₃ of order 6 = 2·3
Non-abelian because 2 | 3 − 1. The cyclic conclusion needs p ∤ q − 1.
#63 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Groups
“(ℤ/2^kℤ)* is cyclic for every k” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#64 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Rings and Fields
“Every prime ideal is maximal” — false
Counterexample: (X) in ℤ[X], or (0) in any integral domain that is not a field
is a domain but not a field. In a PID the implication does hold for non-zero primes.
#65 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Rings and Fields
“In every integral domain, irreducible implies prime” — false
Counterexample: 2 in ℤ[√−5]
2 is irreducible (no element of norm 2) but divides without dividing either factor.
#66 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Rings and Fields
“R a PID implies R[X] is a PID” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#67 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Rings and Fields
“A polynomial irreducible over ℚ is irreducible modulo some prime” — false
Counterexample: x⁴ + 1
Irreducible over , yet reducible modulo every prime.
#68 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Rings and Fields
“A degree-4 polynomial with no rational roots is irreducible over ℚ” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#69 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Rings and Fields
“An algebraic extension is a finite extension” — false
Counterexample: The field of all algebraic numbers Q̄ over ℚ
Every element is algebraic, but the extension has infinite degree (it contains for every n).
#70 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Rings and Fields
“Every extension of degree n has a Galois group of order n” — false
Counterexample: ℚ(∛2)/ℚ has degree 3 but only the identity automorphism
The extension is not normal — the other cube roots are not real. Order = degree only for Galois extensions.
#71 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Topology
“cl(A ∩ B) = cl(A) ∩ cl(B)” — false
Counterexample: A = ℚ, B = ℝ∖ℚ in ℝ
cl(A ∩ B) = cl(∅) = ∅ but cl A ∩ cl .
#72 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Topology
“A product of normal spaces is normal” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#73 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Topology
“A continuous bijection is a homeomorphism” — false
Counterexample: id : (ℝ, discrete) → (ℝ, usual), or t ↦ (cos t, sin t) from [0, 2π) to S¹
Needs compact domain and Hausdorff codomain.
#74 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Topology
“Countably compact implies compact” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#75 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Topology
“The closed unit ball of a normed space is compact” — false
Counterexample: The unit ball of ℓ²
Riesz: compactness of the ball holds exactly in finite dimensions.
#76 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Topology
“Connected components are open” — false
Counterexample: ℚ with the usual topology
Components are singletons, which are not open. They are open exactly when the space is locally connected.
#77 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Topology
“A totally disconnected space is discrete” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#78 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Topology
“A compact T₁ space is Hausdorff” — false
Counterexample: An infinite set with the cofinite topology
Compact and but any two non-empty open sets intersect.
#79 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Analytic Functions
“The Cauchy–Riemann equations at a point imply complex differentiability there” — false
Counterexample: f(z) = (z̄)²/z for z ≠ 0, f(0) = 0
CR hold at 0, but the difference quotient along z = t(1+i) differs from the one along the real axis.
#80 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Analytic Functions
“A harmonic function on any domain has a harmonic conjugate” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#81 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Analytic Functions
“Zeros of a non-constant holomorphic function cannot accumulate” — false
Counterexample: sin(1/z) on ℂ∖{0}
Zeros accumulate at 0, which lies outside the domain. Inside the domain zeros are always isolated.
#82 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Analytic Functions
“C^∞ implies analytic” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#83 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Cauchy Theory
“If f is holomorphic on the domain enclosed by γ except possibly at isolated points, and ∮_γ f = 0, then f has no singularity inside” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#84 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Cauchy Theory
“Cauchy's theorem applies to any domain without singularities of f” — false
Counterexample: f(z) = 1/z on the annulus ½ < |z| < 2
f is holomorphic there but dz — the annulus is not simply connected.
#85 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Cauchy Theory
“A bounded holomorphic function on an unbounded domain is constant” — false
Counterexample: f(z) = eᶻ on {Re z < 0}
|eᶻ| < 1 there, but f is not constant. Liouville needs the whole plane.
#86 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Cauchy Theory
“An entire function omitting one value is constant” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#87 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Cauchy Theory
“|f| attains its minimum on the boundary for holomorphic f” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#88 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Singularities and Residues
“If |f| is bounded near an isolated singularity, the singularity is a pole” — false
Counterexample: f(z) = sin z / z at 0
Bounded ⇒ removable (Riemann). Poles have |f| .
#89 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Singularities and Residues
“A function has a unique Laurent expansion about a point” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#90 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Singularities and Residues
“∮_γ f = 0 implies f is holomorphic inside γ” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#91 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Singularities and Residues
“A small indentation around a simple pole contributes 2πi·Res” — false
Counterexample: The indentation at 0 when computing ∫₀^∞ sin x/x dx
A half-circle contributes Res; using gives twice the right answer.
#92 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Zeros and Mappings
“f′(z) ≠ 0 everywhere implies f is injective” — false
Counterexample: f(z) = eᶻ on ℂ
f′ = eᶻ never vanishes, yet . Non-vanishing derivative gives only local injectivity.
#93 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Zeros and Mappings
“ℂ and the unit disc are biholomorphic (both are simply connected)” — false
Counterexample: Liouville's theorem
A biholomorphism 𝔻 would invert to a bounded entire function. is the sole exception in the Riemann mapping theorem.
#94 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Ordinary Differential Equations
“A continuous right-hand side gives a unique solution” — false
Counterexample: y′ = y^{1/3}, y(0) = 0
Not Lipschitz at 0: y ≡ 0 and y = both solve it, as do infinitely many hybrids.
#95 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Ordinary Differential Equations
“A locally unique solution exists for all time” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#96 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Ordinary Differential Equations
“W(f, g) ≡ 0 implies f and g are linearly dependent” — false
Counterexample: f(x) = x², g(x) = x|x| on ℝ
The Wronskian vanishes identically but no constant multiple relates them. The implication holds only for solutions of a common linear ODE.
#97 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Ordinary Differential Equations
“Every boundary value problem has a Green's function” — false
Counterexample: y″ + π²y = f on [0,1] with y(0) = y(1) = 0
is an eigenvalue of the homogeneous problem, so the operator is not invertible and no Green's function exists.
#98 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Ordinary Differential Equations
“Linearisation determines stability at every equilibrium” — false
Counterexample: ẋ = −y − x³, ẏ = x − y³ at the origin
The linearisation is a centre (eigenvalues ±i), but gives V̇ : asymptotically stable. Non-hyperbolic equilibria escape Hartman–Grobman.
#99 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Partial Differential Equations
“A first-order quasilinear Cauchy problem with smooth data has a global smooth solution” — false
Counterexample: u uₓ + u_y = 0 with u(x, 0) = −x
Characteristics all meet at y = 1: the solution blows up in gradient (a shock).
#100 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Partial Differential Equations
“A PDE has a single type throughout its domain” — false
Counterexample: The Tricomi equation y uₓₓ + u_yy = 0
Elliptic in the upper half-plane, hyperbolic in the lower, parabolic on the axis.
#101 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Partial Differential Equations
“All the classical equations satisfy a maximum principle” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#102 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Numerical Analysis
“Newton's method converges quadratically to any root” — false
Counterexample: f(x) = x² at the root 0
The root is double: ₊, only linear convergence.
#103 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Numerical Analysis
“Newton's method always converges from any starting point” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#104 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Numerical Analysis
“Increasing the number of equally spaced interpolation nodes improves the approximation” — false
Counterexample: Runge's function 1/(1 + 25x²) on [−1, 1]
The interpolants diverge near the endpoints as . Chebyshev nodes restore convergence.
#105 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Numerical Analysis
“A convergent method is stable for any step size” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#106 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Calculus of Variations
“A weak minimum of a functional is a strong minimum” — false
Counterexample: J[y] = ∫₀^π (1 − (y′)²)y² dx at y ≡ 0
In the ball the integrand is non-negative so J ≥ 0; in the ball a steeply oscillating small y makes J negative.
#107 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Linear Integral Equations
“Every integral equation of the second kind has a unique solution” — false
Counterexample: y(x) − 3∫₀¹ tx y(t)dt = eˣ
is an eigenvalue of the kernel tx, and eˣ is not orthogonal to t — no solution exists.
#108 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Linear Integral Equations
“Volterra equations have eigenvalues just like Fredholm equations” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#109 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Classical Mechanics
“The generalised momentum ∂L/∂q̇ always equals mass × velocity” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#110 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Classical Mechanics
“The Hamiltonian always equals the total energy” — false
Counterexample: A bead on a wire rotating at forced angular velocity ω
The constraint is time-dependent, so H is conserved but differs from T + V.
#111 · Probability & Statistics › Probability
“Pairwise independent events are mutually independent” — false
Counterexample: Two fair coin tosses: A = first is heads, B = second is heads, C = the two agree
Each pair is independent, but P(A∩B∩C) = 1/4 ≠ 1/8 = P(A)P(B)P(C).
#112 · Probability & Statistics › Probability
“Every random variable has a moment generating function” — false
Counterexample: The standard Cauchy distribution
E[ for every t ≠ 0; even E|X| is infinite. Its characteristic function exists.
#113 · Probability & Statistics › Probability
“A mixture of two distributions is a linear combination of the variables” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#114 · Probability & Statistics › Probability
“The maximum of independent exponentials is exponential” — false
Counterexample: max(X₁, X₂) with Xᵢ ~ Exp(1)
The minimum is exponential (rate ; the maximum has CDF (1 − , which is not exponential.
#115 · Probability & Statistics › Probability
“If X and Y are each normal and uncorrelated then they are independent” — false
Counterexample: X ~ N(0,1), ε = ±1 with probability ½ independent of X, Y = εX
Y is N(0,1), Cov(X,Y) = 0, but |X| = |Y| always. The pair is not jointly normal.
#116 · Probability & Statistics › Probability
“Uncorrelated implies independent” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#117 · Probability & Statistics › Limit Theorems and Markov Chains
“Convergence in probability implies almost sure convergence” — false
Counterexample: The typewriter sequence on [0,1]
but every is hit infinitely often, so there is no a.s. limit.
#118 · Probability & Statistics › Limit Theorems and Markov Chains
“Xₙ → 0 almost surely implies E[Xₙ] → 0” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#119 · Probability & Statistics › Limit Theorems and Markov Chains
“An irreducible chain with a stationary distribution converges to it” — false
Counterexample: The two-state chain that swaps deterministically (period 2)
½, ½) is stationary and unique, but oscillates between 0 and 1. Aperiodicity is required.
#120 · Probability & Statistics › Limit Theorems and Markov Chains
“A recurrent chain has a stationary distribution” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#121 · Probability & Statistics › Estimation
“A sufficient statistic is complete” — false
Counterexample: X₍ₙ₎ (or (X₍₁₎, X₍ₙ₎)) for Uniform(−θ, θ)
Sufficient but not complete: symmetry gives non-zero functions with zero expectation.
#122 · Probability & Statistics › Estimation
“The Cramér–Rao bound is attained by the UMVUE” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#123 · Probability & Statistics › Estimation
“The MLE is unbiased” — false
Counterexample: σ̂² = (1/n)Σ(Xᵢ − X̄)² for N(μ, σ²), or X₍ₙ₎ for Uniform(0,θ)
Both underestimate systematically; .
#124 · Probability & Statistics › Estimation
“The MLE is unique” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#125 · Probability & Statistics › Hypothesis Testing
“A UMP test exists for every testing problem” — false
Counterexample: H₀: μ = 0 vs H₁: μ ≠ 0 for N(μ, 1)
The MP test for rejects for large X̄, for for small X̄; no single test is best against both.
#126 · Probability & Statistics › Hypothesis Testing
“Any interval of the form [X̄ − (S/√n)t, ∞) with a 90% quantile t is a 90% confidence interval” — false
Counterexample: t = t_{n−1,0.9} under the convention t_{m,α} = (1−α)-th quantile
That t is the 10th percentile, so the interval has coverage 10%, not 90%.
#127 · Probability & Statistics › Linear Models and Multivariate
“OLS is the BLUE in every linear model” — false
Counterexample: Yᵢ = βxᵢ + εᵢ with Var(εᵢ) = σ²xᵢ²
Gauss–Markov assumes constant variance; here weighted least squares (the mean of has smaller variance.
#128 · Probability & Statistics › Linear Models and Multivariate
“Every parameter in the one-way ANOVA model is estimable” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#129 · Probability & Statistics › Linear Models and Multivariate
“If every marginal is normal then the vector is multivariate normal” — false
Counterexample: X ~ N(0,1) and Y = εX with ε = ±1 independent
Both marginals are N(0,1) but X + Y is 0 half the time — not normal, so the pair is not jointly normal.
#130 · Probability & Statistics › Sampling and Design of Experiments
“Systematic sampling is always at least as efficient as SRS” — false
Counterexample: A population with a periodic pattern of period k, sampled every k-th unit
Every sampled unit falls at the same phase, so the sample can be maximally unrepresentative.
#131 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › The Real Line
“Every ordered field is Archimedean” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#132 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Integration
“If ∫₀^∞ f converges then f(x) → 0” — false
Counterexample: f with a spike of height n and width 2/n³ at each integer n
The total area is finite but f is unbounded, so it does not tend to 0.
#133 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Sequences and Series of Functions
“A uniformly bounded sequence in C[0,1] has a uniformly convergent subsequence” — false
Counterexample: fₙ(x) = xⁿ
Bounded by 1, but the pointwise limit is discontinuous so no subsequence converges uniformly. Equicontinuity is the missing hypothesis.
#134 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Functions of Several Variables
“If all partial derivatives exist at a point then f is continuous there” — false
Counterexample: f(x,y) = xy/(x²+y²), f(0,0) = 0
Both partials are 0 at the origin, but f = ½ along y = x, so f is not continuous.
#135 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Functions of Several Variables
“Mixed partial derivatives are always equal” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#136 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Functions of Several Variables
“A C¹ map with everywhere non-zero Jacobian is injective” — false
Counterexample: f(x,y) = (eˣ cos y, eˣ sin y) on ℝ²
The Jacobian determinant is ≠ 0, but . Invertibility is only local.
#137 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“An arbitrary intersection of open sets is open” — false
Counterexample: ∩_{n≥1}(−1/n, 1/n) = {0}
Only finite intersections preserve openness.
#138 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Lebesgue Measure and Integration
“A set of measure zero is countable” — false
Counterexample: The Cantor set
Uncountable, yet measure zero.
#139 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Lebesgue Measure and Integration
“A nowhere dense set has measure zero” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#140 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Lebesgue Measure and Integration
“Pointwise convergence implies convergence of the integrals” — false
Counterexample: fₙ = n·1_{(0,1/n)} on [0,1]
pointwise but always. Domination or monotonicity is essential.
#141 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Lebesgue Measure and Integration
“Iterated integrals of a measurable function always agree” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#142 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Lebesgue Measure and Integration
“L¹[0,1] ⊆ L²[0,1]” — false
Counterexample: f(x) = 1/√x
but dx. On a finite measure space the inclusion runs the other way.
#143 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Vector Spaces and Linear Maps
“An injective linear operator on a vector space is surjective” — false
Counterexample: The right shift on ℓ²: (x₁, x₂, …) ↦ (0, x₁, x₂, …)
Injective but misses everything with a non-zero first coordinate. Rank–nullity needs finite dimension.
#144 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Eigenvalues and Canonical Forms
“Every real matrix has a Jordan form over ℝ” — false
Counterexample: The rotation [[0,−1],[1,0]]
Its eigenvalues ±i are not real; over one uses the real Jordan form with a 2×2 rotation block.
#145 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Eigenvalues and Canonical Forms
“Two matrices with the same characteristic and minimal polynomials are similar” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#146 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Inner Product Spaces and Forms
“A real matrix with all real eigenvalues is orthogonally diagonalisable” — false
Counterexample: [[1,1],[0,1]]
Eigenvalue 1 twice but only one eigenvector; orthogonal diagonalisability requires symmetry.
#147 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Inner Product Spaces and Forms
“det A > 0 implies A is positive definite” — false
Counterexample: A = diag(−1, −1)
det = 1 > 0 but both eigenvalues are negative. All leading principal minors must be positive.
#148 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Determinants and Matrix Tricks
“There exist matrices with AB − BA = I” — false
Counterexample: Impossible over ℝ or ℂ in finite dimensions
trace(AB − BA) = 0 but trace(I) = n ≠ 0. (It is possible for unbounded operators — the Heisenberg relation.)