has no convergent subsequence since ‖‖ . Heine–Borel is only.
Counterexample bank
Part C is won by knowing which tempting claims are false. 148 counterexamples; 85 free. The rest come with the Notes pack.
#1 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Closed and bounded ⇒ compact” — false
Counterexample: Closed unit ball in ℓ² (or in C[0,1] with sup norm)
#2 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Bounded ⇒ totally bounded” — false
Counterexample: ℝ with the discrete metric
Everything is within distance 1, but no finite set of balls of radius ½ covers it.
#3 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Topology
“Countably compact implies compact” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
#4 · Complex Analysis, Algebra & Topology › Topology
“The closed unit ball of a normed space is compact” — false
Counterexample: The unit ball of ℓ²
Riesz: compactness of the ball holds exactly in finite dimensions.
#5 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Sequences and Series of Functions
“A uniformly bounded sequence in C[0,1] has a uniformly convergent subsequence” — false
Counterexample: fₙ(x) = xⁿ
Bounded by 1, but the pointwise limit is discontinuous so no subsequence converges uniformly. Equicontinuity is the missing hypothesis.