Homeomorphic, but is complete and (0,1) is not (1/n is Cauchy).
Counterexample bank
Part C is won by knowing which tempting claims are false. 148 counterexamples; 85 free. The rest come with the Notes pack.
AllODEPDEabeliananalyticityanovabairecalculus of variationscanonical formscauchy-riemanncompactnesscompletenesscomplexconformalconnectednesscontinuitycontour integrationconvergencedifferentiationdistributionsfieldsfixed pointgaloisgreengroupsharmonicinjectivityintegral equationsintegrationlaurentlimsuplinear algebraliouvillelpmarkovmeasuremechanicsmetric spacesmultivariablemultivariatenumericalp-groupspermutationspolynomialspower seriesprobabilityquadratic formsreal analysisregressionresiduesringssamplingseparabilityseparationsequencesseriessingularitiesstabilitystatisticssylowtestingtopologyuniform convergencewronskianzeros
#1 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Completeness is a topological property” — false
Counterexample: (0,1) and ℝ
completenessmetric spaces
#2 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“d(Tx, Ty) < d(x, y) for all x ≠ y on a complete space ⇒ T has a fixed point” — false
Counterexample: T(x) = x + 1/x on [1, ∞)
Distances strictly decrease but no contraction constant k < 1 exists; no fixed point.
completenessfixed point
#3 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“A countable dense subset of ℝ can be a G_δ” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
completenessbaire