is an eigenvalue of the kernel tx, and eˣ is not orthogonal to t — no solution exists.
Counterexample bank
Part C is won by knowing which tempting claims are false. 148 counterexamples; 85 free. The rest come with the Notes pack.
AllODEPDEabeliananalyticityanovabairecalculus of variationscanonical formscauchy-riemanncompactnesscompletenesscomplexconformalconnectednesscontinuitycontour integrationconvergencedifferentiationdistributionsfieldsfixed pointgaloisgreengroupsharmonicinjectivityintegral equationsintegrationlaurentlimsuplinear algebraliouvillelpmarkovmeasuremechanicsmetric spacesmultivariablemultivariatenumericalp-groupspermutationspolynomialspower seriesprobabilityquadratic formsreal analysisregressionresiduesringssamplingseparabilityseparationsequencesseriessingularitiesstabilitystatisticssylowtestingtopologyuniform convergencewronskianzeros
#1 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Linear Integral Equations
“Every integral equation of the second kind has a unique solution” — false
Counterexample: y(x) − 3∫₀¹ tx y(t)dt = eˣ
integral equations
#2 · ODE, PDE & Applied Mathematics › Linear Integral Equations
“Volterra equations have eigenvalues just like Fredholm equations” — false
Counterexample locked — unlock with Notes + PYQ
integral equations