has no convergent subsequence since ‖‖ . Heine–Borel is only.
Counterexample bank
Part C is won by knowing which tempting claims are false. 148 counterexamples; 85 free. The rest come with the Notes pack.
AllODEPDEabeliananalyticityanovabairecalculus of variationscanonical formscauchy-riemanncompactnesscompletenesscomplexconformalconnectednesscontinuitycontour integrationconvergencedifferentiationdistributionsfieldsfixed pointgaloisgreengroupsharmonicinjectivityintegral equationsintegrationlaurentlimsuplinear algebraliouvillelpmarkovmeasuremechanicsmetric spacesmultivariablemultivariatenumericalp-groupspermutationspolynomialspower seriesprobabilityquadratic formsreal analysisregressionresiduesringssamplingseparabilityseparationsequencesseriessingularitiesstabilitystatisticssylowtestingtopologyuniform convergencewronskianzeros
#1 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Closed and bounded ⇒ compact” — false
Counterexample: Closed unit ball in ℓ² (or in C[0,1] with sup norm)
compactnessmetric spaces
#2 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Bounded ⇒ totally bounded” — false
Counterexample: ℝ with the discrete metric
Everything is within distance 1, but no finite set of balls of radius ½ covers it.
compactnessmetric spaces
#3 · Analysis & Linear Algebra › Metric Spaces
“Completeness is a topological property” — false
Counterexample: (0,1) and ℝ
Homeomorphic, but is complete and (0,1) is not (1/n is Cauchy).
completenessmetric spaces