Skip to content
Part BCSIR NET December 2023

Fredholm and Volterra equations

The value of λ\lambda for which the integral equation y(x)=λ∫01x2y(x) = \lambda\int_{0}^{1} x^{2} ex+te^{x+t} y(t) dt has a non-zero solution is

  1. A.4/(1+e2)4/(1 + e^{2})
  2. B.2/(1+e2)2/(1 + e^{2})
  3. C.4/(e2−1)4/(e^{2} - 1)✓ Correct
  4. D.2/(e2−1)2/(e^{2} - 1)

The idea, in plain words

The kernel splits into a factor depending only on the outer variable times a factor depending only on the inner one, so the solution is forced to be a multiple of the outer factor. Substituting that back turns the whole integral equation into one number equation.

Solution

Separable kernel: y=cx2ey = c x^{2}eˣ with c=λc∫01t2c = \lambda{}c \int_{0}^{1} t^{2} e2te^{2t} dt =λc(e2−1)/4= \lambda{}c (e^{2} - 1)/4

so λ=4/(e2−1)\lambda = 4/(e^{2} - 1).

Why each option is right or wrong

Checked against 2 symbolic computations
  • False.

    The denominator should be e2−1e^{2} - 1, not e2+1e^{2} + 1.

    That sign comes from evaluating ∫01t2e2t\int_{0}^{1} t^{2}e^{2t} dt: SymPy gives e2/4−1/4,ae^{2}/4 - 1/4, a difference.

    Adding the boundary terms instead of subtracting produces this option.

  • B.Wrong

    False on both counts — the numerator should be 4, not 2, and the denominator e2−1e^{2} - 1, not e2+1e^{2} + 1.

    The 4 comes from the ¼ in the evaluated integral.

  • C.Correct

    True.

    The kernel x2ex+tx^{2}e^{x+t} =(x2e= (x^{2}eˣ)(e^t) is separable

    so any solution has the form y=c⋅x2ey = c\cdot{}x^{2}eˣ.

    Substituting gives c=λc∫01t2e2tc = \lambda{}c\int_{0}^{1} t^{2}e^{2t} dt, and for c ≠ 0 this requires λ∫01t2e2t\lambda\int_{0}^{1} t^{2}e^{2t} dt = 1.

    SymPy evaluates that integral as (e2−1)/4≈1.5973(e^{2} - 1)/4 \approx 1.5973

    so λ=4/(e2−1)≈0.6261(\lambda = 4/(e^{2} - 1) \approx 0.6261 (verified).

    The trigger: a kernel that factors as g(x)h(t) reduces the whole problem to one scalar equation — write y = c·g(x) immediately.

  • False.

    The denominator is right but the numerator is halved.

    ∫01t2e2t\int_{0}^{1} t^{2}e^{2t} dt =(e2−1)/4= (e^{2} - 1)/4, and inverting a quarter gives a factor 4, not 2.

    Mis-integrating by parts once rather than twice is the usual source of the missing factor.

2 of these 3 wrong options correspond to a named reasoning error — the same errors recur across subjects.

Related counterexample: Every integral equation of the second kind has a unique solution

More on this topic

The chapter behind this: Integral equations: Fredholm vs Volterra — free to read

From Linear Integral Equations › Fredholm and Volterra equations

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram