Skip to content
Part BCSIR NET December 2023power-sums-mod-p

Power sums mod p

Which one of the following is equal to 137+237+337+⋯+88371^{37} + 2^{37} + 3^{37} + \cdots + 88^{37} in Z/89Z\mathbb{Z}/89\mathbb{Z}?

  1. A.88
  2. B.−88
  3. C.−2
  4. D.0✓ Correct

The idea, in plain words

Adding up the same power of every non-zero remainder is a sum with a hidden symmetry: the terms can be rearranged into a repeating cycle that cancels itself out. It fails to cancel only when the power lines up exactly with the length of the cycle, which is the case to check.

Solution

89 is prime and (Z/89)(\mathbb{Z}/89)* is cyclic of order 88.

For a generator g,∑kg, \sum_{k} k37=∑jk^{37} = \sum_j g37jg^{37j} is a geometric sum equal to 0 because 88 ∤ 37 (so g37≠1)g^{37} \ne 1).

Why each option is right or wrong

Checked against 4 symbolic computations
  • False here

    but it is the right answer to a neighbouring question — which is exactly why it is offered.

    The power sum ∑kmmodp\sum{}k^m mod p equals −1 ≡ p − 1 precisely when (p − 1) | m, and 0 otherwise.

    SymPy computes both cases directly: ∑k88mod89=88\sum{}k^{88} mod 89 = 88

    while ∑k37mod89=0\sum{}k^{37} mod 89 = 0.

    Since 88 ∤ 37 (verified: 37 mod 88 = 37), we are in the second case.

  • B.Wrong

    False.

    −88 ≡ 1 (mod 89), and the sum is 0, not 1.

  • C.Wrong

    False.

    The sum is 0; −2 arises from no step of the correct argument.

  • D.Correct

    True — SymPy evaluates the sum directly and reduces it: ∑k=188\sum_{k=1}^{88} k37≡0(mod89)k^{37} \equiv 0 (mod 89).

    The argument: 89 is prime (verified)

    so (Z/89)(\mathbb{Z}/89)* is cyclic of order 88 with some generator g, and the sum becomes ∑j=087\sum_{j=0}^{87} (g37)j(g^{37})^j — a geometric series.

    Because 88 ∤ 37,g37≠137, g^{37} \ne 1

    so the series sums to (g37⋅88−1)/(g37−1)=0(g^{37}\cdot^{88} - 1)/(g^{37} - 1) = 0.

    The trigger: a full power sum over Z/p\mathbb{Z}/p should immediately raise the question 'does (p−1) divide the exponent?'

1 of these 3 wrong options correspond to a named reasoning error — the same errors recur across subjects.

The trap it tests

Execution slip

The idea was right. The computation was not.

Drill statements like this

Related counterexample: Every prime ideal is maximal

More on this topic

The chapter behind this: Ideals, quotients and the Chinese remainder theorem — free to read

From Rings and Fields › Ideals, quotient rings, prime & maximal ideals, CRT

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram