Consider the quadratic form f(x,y,z) = [x y z] A [x;y;z], where A is an invertible 3×3 symmetric matrix over . Assume that there exists {(0,0,0)} such that . Which of the following statements is necessarily true?
Part BCSIR NET December 2025a-nonzero-real-zero-of-an-invertible-form-rules-out-both-definite-cases-at-once
A nonzero real zero of an invertible form rules out both definite cases at once
Related counterexample: Every real symmetric matrix is positive definite if det > 0
- sylvester signatureJune 2023
- indefinite implies isotropicDecember 2023
- leading principal minorsDecember 2023
- Part C questionDecember 2023
- isotropic vectors exist in an indefinite formDecember 2024
- positive definite says nothing about this basisDecember 2024
The chapter behind this: Quadratic forms, signature and definiteness — free to read
From Inner Product Spaces and Forms › Quadratic forms, positive definiteness, Sylvester's law
Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.