Skip to content
Part CCSIR NET June 2025in-an-abelian-quotient-every-subgroup-is-its-own-core

In an abelian quotient every subgroup is its own core

Let G be a group, H a subgroup of G, and T = {gH | g ∈ G}, the set of all left cosets of H in G. Let S_T be the set of all permutations of T and be the map defined by gg. For a prime number p, let 𝔽_p denote the field with p elements. In which of the following cases is trivial?

  1. A.G = GL𝔽_p) and H is a subgroup of order p.
  2. B.G = SL𝔽_p) and H is a subgroup of order p.
  3. C.p ≡ 3 (mod 4), G = GL𝔽_p)/SL𝔽_p) and H is a subgroup of order 2.
  4. D.p ≡ 1 (mod 4), G = GL𝔽_p)/SL𝔽_p) and H is a subgroup of order 2.

You have the answer. Trap Analysis is why the other three were written.

Not a worked solution repeated four times — the specific reasoning error each wrong option was built to reward, and why this one tests standard counterexample.

See pricing

50 are analysed free — try those first.

The trap it tests

Standard counterexample

There is a canonical object that settles this. Recognising it is the whole question.

Drill statements like this

Related counterexample: Every group of order p² is cyclic

More on this topic

The chapter behind this: Group actions, the class equation and p-groups — free to read

From GroupsGroup actions, class equation, p-groups

ShareWhatsAppTelegram