Skip to content
Part ACSIR NET September 2022track-the-invariant-part

Track the invariant part

A 5 kg watermelon contains 99% water by weight. Some of the water evaporates and the melon now contains 98% water by weight. What is the weight (in kg) of watermelon now?

  1. A.4.5
  2. B.2.5✓ Correct
  3. C.4.8
  4. D.4.9

The idea, in plain words

The water evaporates but the solid pulp does not, so follow the pulp instead. It begins as one percent of the melon and ends as two percent, so the melon must have halved — even though the water figure barely moved.

Solution

The solid matter is 1% of 5 kg = 0.05 kg and does not evaporate.

Afterwards it is 2% of the new weight W

so 0.05 = 0.02 W and W = 2.5 kg.

Tracking the part that stays constant, rather than the water, is what makes this tractable.

Why each option is right or wrong

Checked against 1 symbolic computation
  • False, and 4.5 is what intuition suggests: the water fraction fell by only one percentage point

    so surely the melon barely changed.

    It did not — the solid matter went from 1% to 2% of the total

    which means the total had to halve.

  • B.Correct

    True.

    Track the solid

    which does not evaporate: it is 1% of 5 kg = 0.05 kg throughout.

    Afterwards the solid is 2% of the new weight W

    so 0.05 = 0.02 W and W = 2.5 kg (verified).

    The trigger: in any evaporation or concentration problem, follow the quantity that stays fixed — here doubling the solid's share from 1% to 2% forces the total to halve.

  • False.

    4.8 comes from subtracting a small amount of water proportional to the one-point change

    treating percentages as if they subtract directly.

    The relevant ratio is between the solid fractions, 1% and 2%

    which differ by a factor of two rather than by one point.

  • False.

    4.9 is 5 minus 1% of 5, that is removing 0.05 kg — the weight of the solid rather than the weight of the evaporated water.

    The water lost is 4.95 − 2.45 = 2.5 kg, fifty times larger.

3 of these 3 wrong options correspond to a named reasoning error — the same errors recur across subjects.

The trap it tests

Execution slip

The idea was right. The computation was not.

Drill statements like this

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram