Skip to content

Why (0,1) is not compact — an explicit cover with no finite subcover

Metric SpacesAnalysis & Linear Algebrafree

Not an appeal to Heine–Borel: the actual cover, and why every finite subfamily misses points.

Why (0,1) is not compact — an explicit cover with no finite subcoverinteractivefree

Step 1 / 4The claim

is bounded, so if compactness were only about boundedness it would qualify. Show directly that it is not compact by exhibiting an open cover with no finite subcover.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram