Skip to content
The book

Liouville, Morera, maximum modulus principle

Why this is asked: Recognise Liouville in disguise: bounded, bounded real part, bounded on a growth scale, or missing two values. Maximum modulus turns interior bounds into boundary bounds.

In one sentence

Holomorphic functions are rigid: bounded on all of C\mathbb{C} forces constant, a maximum of ∣f∣|f| inside forces constant, and the converse of Cauchy's theorem holds under a hypothesis weak enough to be useful.

Why the exam asks it

Because each theorem has a hypothesis that sounds like a formality and is not — "entire", "bounded on C\mathbb{C}", "on a domain", "continuous" — and because Liouville is routinely misapplied to functions bounded only on the real line. sin⁡z\sin z is the standard trap and it is set most years in some form.

The idea

Liouville

A bounded entire function is constant.

From Cauchy's estimate with n=1n = 1: ∣f′(a)∣≤M/r|f'(a)| \le M/r for every rr, and letting r→∞r \to \infty gives f′≡0f' \equiv 0.

Both words carry weight. Entire means holomorphic on all of C\mathbb{C} — 1/z1/z is bounded outside the unit disc and is not entire. Bounded means bounded on C\mathbb{C}, not on some subset.

|sin x| on the real axis never leaves [−1, 1] which is the whole of most people's experience of sine |sin(iy)| = sinh y on the imaginary axis grows like e^y / 2, without limit sin is entire and unbounded, so Liouville has nothing to say about it
sin is bounded on the real axis and grows like eʸ/2 on the imaginary axis. Bounded on ℝ says nothing about bounded on ℂ, which is what Liouville requires.

sin⁡z\sin z is entire, satisfies ∣sin⁡x∣≤1|\sin x| \le 1 for every real xx, and is not constant. There is no contradiction: on the imaginary axis sin⁡(iy)=isinh⁡y\sin(iy) = i\sinh y, which grows like ey/2e^{y}/2. At z=5iz = 5i the modulus already exceeds 7474. Bounded on R\mathbb{R} is not bounded on C\mathbb{C}, and the option will rely on you not noticing which is claimed.

The useful strengthenings:

  • ∣f(z)∣≤M∣z∣k|f(z)| \le M|z|^{k} for large ∣z∣|z| and ff entire ⇒\Rightarrow ff is a polynomial of degree at most kk. Cauchy's estimate on f(k+1)f^{(k+1)}.
  • Re⁡f\operatorname{Re}f bounded above ⇒\Rightarrow ff constant. Apply Liouville to efe^{f}, using ∣ef∣=eRe⁡f|e^{f}| = e^{\operatorname{Re}f}.
  • ff entire and non-constant ⇒\Rightarrow f(C)f(\mathbb{C}) is dense in C\mathbb{C}. That is the little Picard theorem's weaker cousin and follows from Liouville applied to 1/(f−w)1/(f-w).

Fundamental theorem of algebra: if a non-constant polynomial pp had no zero, 1/p1/p would be entire and bounded — it tends to 00 at infinity — hence constant. Contradiction.

Morera

If ff is continuous on a domain DD and ∮∂Tf=0\oint_{\partial T} f = 0 for every triangle T⊂DT \subset D, then ff is holomorphic on DD.

The converse of Cauchy's theorem, and the hypotheses are exactly what stop it being trivially false. Continuity is required. Vanishing on every triangle is required — one contour, or one family of contours, is not enough. Its usual role is proving that a limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic, since uniform convergence on compact sets passes through the integral.

Maximum modulus

If ff is holomorphic and non-constant on a domain, ∣f∣|f| has no local maximum in that domain.

So on a bounded domain with ff continuous up to the boundary, max⁡∣f∣\max|f| is attained on the boundary. On ∣z∣≤2|z| \le 2, ∣z2∣|z^2| reaches 44 on the rim and nowhere inside.

Two corollaries worth having:

  • Minimum modulus: ∣f∣|f| has no interior minimum unless ff has a zero there. The exception is the whole content — apply the maximum principle to 1/f1/f, which needs f≠0f \ne 0.
  • Re⁡f\operatorname{Re}f and Im⁡f\operatorname{Im}f obey the same principle, via efe^{f} and eife^{if}.

The mechanism is the open mapping theorem: a non-constant holomorphic function maps open sets to open sets, so the image of a neighbourhood of aa is a neighbourhood of f(a)f(a) and contains points of larger modulus. Nothing can be a local maximum.

Schwarz's lemma

f:D→Df : \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D} holomorphic with f(0)=0f(0) = 0. Then ∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣|f(z)| \le |z| and ∣f′(0)∣≤1|f'(0)| \le 1; equality in either, at a single point, forces f(z)=czf(z) = cz with ∣c∣=1|c| = 1.

Proof is the maximum principle applied to f(z)/zf(z)/z, extended holomorphically across 00. The rigidity — one equality anywhere pins the whole function — is the examinable part.

Where intuition breaks

"ff is entire and ∣f∣≤1|f| \le 1 on R\mathbb{R}, so ff is constant." sin⁡z\sin z. Liouville needs bounded on C\mathbb{C}. The single most reliable trap in this topic.

"ff is bounded and holomorphic, so constant." Needs entire. f(z)=1/zf(z) = 1/z on ∣z∣>1|z| > 1 is bounded and holomorphic and not constant; so is any bounded holomorphic function on the disc.

"ff is entire and non-constant, so ∣f∣→∞|f| \to \infty." Only for polynomials. eze^{z} is entire, non-constant, and tends to 00 along the negative real axis. What Liouville gives is unboundedness, not divergence.

"A bounded harmonic function on R2\mathbb{R}^2 need not be constant." It is constant — the harmonic Liouville theorem. True, and worth recognising among false options.

"∣f∣|f| attains its minimum on the boundary." Only if ff has no zero inside. f(z)=zf(z) = z on ∣z∣≤1|z| \le 1 attains its minimum at the centre.

"Morera needs ∮f=0\oint f = 0 for every closed contour." Triangles suffice, which is what makes it usable. And continuity is required — options drop it.

"∮γf=0\oint_\gamma f = 0 for one contour, so ff is holomorphic." Not Morera. z‾\overline{z} integrates to 00 round any contour not enclosing the origin and is nowhere holomorphic.

"Schwarz's lemma applies to any map of the disc to itself." It needs f(0)=0f(0) = 0. Without that fixed point the correct statement is the Schwarz–Pick inequality.

The exam's angle

  1. When Liouville is invoked, check where the bound holds. On R\mathbb{R}, on a half-plane, on a strip — none of these is C\mathbb{C}, and sin⁡z\sin z or eze^{z} breaks each.
  2. Growth conditions mean Cauchy estimates. ∣f∣≤M∣z∣k|f| \le M|z|^k gives a polynomial of degree ≤k\le k; count the degree from the exponent.
  3. A bounded real part means consider efe^{f}. This trick answers a whole family of options.
  4. For maximum modulus, look at the boundary and nowhere else — unless the question is about a minimum, in which case first ask whether ff has a zero.
  5. If a question says a limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic, the tool is Morera, with uniform convergence on compact sets.

The night before

  • Liouville: bounded entire ⇒\Rightarrow constant. sin⁡z\sin z is bounded on R\mathbb{R} and unbounded on C\mathbb{C} — sin⁡(iy)=isinh⁡y\sin(iy) = i\sinh y.
  • ∣f∣≤M∣z∣k|f| \le M|z|^k and entire ⇒\Rightarrow polynomial of degree ≤k\le k.
  • Re⁡f\operatorname{Re}f bounded ⇒\Rightarrow constant, via efe^{f} and ∣ef∣=eRe⁡f|e^{f}| = e^{\operatorname{Re}f}.
  • Fundamental theorem of algebra from Liouville applied to 1/p1/p.
  • Morera: continuous, and ∮=0\oint = 0 on every triangle ⇒\Rightarrow holomorphic. Used for limits of holomorphic functions.
  • Maximum modulus: no interior maximum for non-constant ff; the maximum is on the boundary.
  • Minimum modulus: no interior minimum unless ff vanishes there. f(z)=zf(z) = z on the disc.
  • Open mapping: non-constant holomorphic maps open to open. That is why no interior maximum exists.
  • Schwarz: f:D→Df:\mathbb{D}\to\mathbb{D}, f(0)=0f(0)=0 ⇒\Rightarrow ∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣|f(z)|\le|z|, ∣f′(0)∣≤1|f'(0)|\le1; equality forces a rotation.
  • Entire and non-constant gives unbounded, not ∣f∣→∞|f| \to \infty: eze^z.

See it move

Liouville, and the growth bounds that do not force constancyinteractive

This visual is part of Trap Analysis

Four hypotheses — which collapse the function to a constant and which only make it a polynomial.

Unlock interactive visuals

The trap here

“A bounded holomorphic function on an unbounded domain is constant” — false

f(z) = eᶻ on {Re z < 0}

|eᶻ| < 1 there, but f is not constant. Liouville needs the whole plane.

More on this →

More in Cauchy Theory

Take it further

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

Next: Laurent series, classification of singularities, Casorati–Weierstrass

Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram

Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 2