Skip to content
The book

Cauchy's theorem and integral formula

Why this is asked: Pick the right tool: Cauchy's theorem (no singularities inside) vs the integral formula (one simple pole) vs residues (several). Simple connectedness is what makes ∮ = 0.

In one sentence

On a simply connected domain every closed contour integral of a holomorphic function vanishes, the single exception ∮dz/z=2πi\oint dz/z = 2\pi i is where all the content lives, and the integral formula turns that exception into a machine for evaluating functions and their derivatives.

Why the exam asks it

Because "simply connected" is the hypothesis candidates skip, and because almost every contour integral in the paper reduces to one computation — ∮zn dz\oint z^n\,dz round a circle — which is 00 for every integer nn except −1-1. A candidate who knows that one fact and where the singularities are can do most of this topic without integrating anything.

The idea

For a contour γ\gamma and continuous ff, ∫γf(z) dz=∫abf(γ(t))γ′(t) dt\int_\gamma f(z)\,dz = \int_a^b f(\gamma(t))\gamma'(t)\,dt.

The ML inequality bounds it: ∣∫γf∣≤M⋅L\left|\int_\gamma f\right| \le M \cdot L where MM bounds ∣f∣|f| on γ\gamma and LL is the length. Crude, and it proves more of this topic than anything else.

The one computation

Round ∣z∣=r|z| = r, parametrise z=reitz = re^{it}, so dz=ireitdtdz = ire^{it}dt and

∮∣z∣=rzn dz=∫02πirn+1ei(n+1)t dt={2πin=−10otherwise.\oint_{|z|=r} z^{n}\,dz = \int_0^{2\pi} i r^{n+1}e^{i(n+1)t}\,dt = \begin{cases} 2\pi i & n = -1\\ 0 & \text{otherwise.}\end{cases}

Note what is special: not that nn is negative — z−2z^{-2} integrates to 00 as well — but that n=−1n = -1 is the one power whose antiderivative, log⁡z\log z, cannot be defined single-valuedly around the origin. Everything else has a single-valued antiderivative and so integrates to zero round any loop.

Cauchy's theorem

Cauchy–Goursat. If ff is holomorphic on a simply connected domain DD, then ∮γf(z) dz=0\oint_\gamma f(z)\,dz = 0 for every closed contour γ\gamma in DD.

simply connected the loop shrinks to a point, so ∮ f = 0 punctured at 0 0 it snags on the puncture: ∮ dz/z = 2πi
Cauchy's theorem is a statement about the shape of the domain. A loop with nothing in its way shrinks to a point; a loop round a puncture snags on it, and the integral remembers.

The hypothesis is about the domain, not the function. 1/z1/z is holomorphic on C∖{0}\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}, perfectly well behaved everywhere it is defined, and ∮∣z∣=1dz/z=2πi≠0\oint_{|z|=1} dz/z = 2\pi i \ne 0. Nothing is wrong with ff; the domain has a hole and the loop cannot be shrunk past it.

The practical consequence is deformation: a contour may be moved freely as long as it does not cross a singularity. So any loop winding once around the origin gives 2πi2\pi i, whatever its shape, and this is what lets you replace an awkward contour with a circle.

The integral formula

If ff is holomorphic on and inside a positively oriented simple closed contour γ\gamma, and aa is inside γ\gamma, then

f(a)=12πi∮γf(z)z−a dz.f(a) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_\gamma \frac{f(z)}{z - a}\,dz .

The values on the contour determine every value inside — a rigidity with no real-variable analogue. If aa lies outside, the integrand is holomorphic inside and the integral is 00 instead. Which of the two applies is decided entirely by where aa sits, and that is the commonest way these questions are made.

Differentiating under the integral gives

f(n)(a)=n!2πi∮γf(z)(z−a)n+1 dz,f^{(n)}(a) = \frac{n!}{2\pi i}\oint_\gamma \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^{n+1}}\,dz,

and with it the fact that a holomorphic function is infinitely differentiable — one derivative buys all of them, which is false in every real-variable sense.

Cauchy's estimates

From the formula and ML, if ∣f∣≤M|f| \le M on ∣z−a∣=r|z - a| = r then

∣f(n)(a)∣≤n! Mrn.|f^{(n)}(a)| \le \frac{n!\,M}{r^{n}} .

Everything in the next chapter — Liouville, the fundamental theorem of algebra, the characterisation of polynomials by growth — comes out of letting r→∞r \to \infty here.

Several singularities

With more than one bad point inside, split by partial fractions. For 1z(z−1)=−1z+1z−1\dfrac{1}{z(z-1)} = \dfrac{-1}{z} + \dfrac{1}{z-1} round ∣z∣=2|z| = 2: each term contributes 2πi2\pi i times its coefficient, giving −2πi+2πi=0-2\pi i + 2\pi i = 0. This is the residue theorem arriving early, and partial fractions will answer most questions before you need it formally.

Where intuition breaks

"ff is holomorphic on the domain, so ∮f=0\oint f = 0." 1/z1/z on C∖{0}\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}. The missing hypothesis is simple connectedness of the domain, and it is missing in the option rather than in the function. This is the topic's central hypothesis dropped.

"∮γf=0\oint_\gamma f = 0 for some closed contour, so ff is holomorphic." ∮∣z∣=1z‾ dz=∮z−1⋅∣z∣2dz\oint_{|z|=1} \overline{z}\,dz = \oint z^{-1}\cdot|z|^2 dz, and on the unit circle z‾=1/z\overline z = 1/z, giving 2πi2\pi i — but take f(z)=z‾f(z) = \overline z round a contour not enclosing the origin and you get 00 from a nowhere-holomorphic function. One vanishing integral proves nothing; Morera needs it for every triangle, plus continuity.

"The integral formula gives f(a)f(a) wherever aa is." Only for aa inside. Outside, the answer is 00. Half the options in this topic are the same integral with the point moved.

"∮z−2dz=2πi\oint z^{-2}dz = 2\pi i because the exponent is negative." It is 00. Only n=−1n = -1 survives, because only 1/z1/z lacks a single-valued antiderivative.

"ff holomorphic inside γ\gamma is enough." The theorem asks for holomorphic on and inside. A singularity sitting on the contour itself invalidates it, and that case is set deliberately.

"Deformation lets me move the contour anywhere." Anywhere it does not cross a singularity. Crossing one changes the answer, which is precisely what the winding number counts.

The exam's angle

  1. Locate the singularities, then ask which are inside. That question answers most contour integrals before any calculation.
  2. Reduce to ∮zndz\oint z^n dz. Partial fractions, or a series expansion, turns nearly everything into a sum of these, and only the n=−1n = -1 terms survive.
  3. Check whether the domain is simply connected. If it is, and ff is holomorphic there, the answer is 00 and you are done.
  4. For f(n)f^{(n)}, match the power in the denominator. An integrand with (z−a)n+1(z-a)^{n+1} underneath is the derivative formula wearing a disguise, and the factor is n!n!.
  5. Reach for ML when asked to bound rather than evaluate. Estimate ∣f∣|f| on the contour, multiply by the length, and that is usually the intended route.

The night before

  • ∮∣z∣=rzndz=2πi\oint_{|z|=r} z^n dz = 2\pi i if n=−1n = -1, else 00. The whole topic rests on this.
  • Cauchy–Goursat: holomorphic on a simply connected domain ⇒\Rightarrow every closed contour integral is 00. The hypothesis is on the domain.
  • ∮∣z∣=1dz/z=2πi\oint_{|z|=1} dz/z = 2\pi i: nothing is wrong with 1/z1/z, the domain has a hole.
  • Deformation: move the contour freely, never across a singularity.
  • Integral formula: f(a)=12πi∮f(z)z−adzf(a) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint \frac{f(z)}{z-a}dz for aa inside; 00 for aa outside.
  • f(n)(a)=n!2πi∮f(z)(z−a)n+1dzf^{(n)}(a) = \frac{n!}{2\pi i}\oint \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^{n+1}}dz. Holomorphic ⇒\Rightarrow infinitely differentiable.
  • Cauchy estimates: ∣f(n)(a)∣≤n!M/rn|f^{(n)}(a)| \le n!M/r^n.
  • ML: ∣∫γf∣≤ML|\int_\gamma f| \le ML.
  • Several poles: partial fractions, then add the n=−1n=-1 pieces.

See it move

Cauchy's integral formula, and what it gives you for freeinteractivefree

Step 1 / 4The theorem

If ff is holomorphic on and inside a simple closed contour CC, then ∮Cf=0\oint_C f = 0. If aa is inside CC,

f(a)=12πi∮Cf(z)z−a dz.f(a) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_C \frac{f(z)}{z-a}\,dz.

The value at an interior point is determined entirely by the boundary values.

More in Cauchy Theory

Take it further

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

Next: Liouville, Morera, maximum modulus principle

Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram

Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 2