Galois theory essentials
Why this is asked: For an exam you need the Galois groups of x³ − 2, x⁴ − 2, xⁿ − 1 and the fundamental correspondence — subgroups ↔ intermediate fields, with normal subgroups ↔ normal extensions.
In one sentence
For a normal and separable extension the subgroups of the Galois group correspond exactly to the intermediate fields, inclusion-reversing — and the whole subject is the consequences of that dictionary.
Why the exam asks it
Because it turns questions about infinitely many intermediate fields into questions about finitely many subgroups, and because "Galois" has two hypotheses that options drop. is not Galois, and the group of order people expect does not exist.
The idea
finite is Galois if it is normal and separable. Then , the automorphisms of fixing pointwise, has order exactly .
In characteristic and over finite fields every extension is separable, so in this syllabus Galois effectively means normal, that is a splitting field.
Fundamental theorem. For Galois with , there is an inclusion-reversing bijection
given by and , with and . Moreover is normal , and then .
The smallest example showing everything is , degree , with group the Klein four-group. Its three subgroups of order match the three intermediate fields , , . The third one is the detail worth noticing: is fixed by the automorphism negating both square roots, which is why it is there and why the count comes out at three rather than two.
Since is abelian, every subgroup is normal, so every intermediate field is normal over .
The non-normal example
has splitting field of degree , with — the group permutes the three roots and every permutation occurs.
corresponds to a subgroup of order , of index . That subgroup is not normal in , which is precisely why is not a normal extension. The dictionary translates one fact into the other exactly.
Note also is trivial, not of order : any automorphism must send to a root of inside the field, and only one is there. So , and the failure of that equality is the failure of being Galois.
Standard Galois groups
- Cyclotomic: , of order . For this is cyclic of order ; for it is the Klein group, so it is not always cyclic.
- Finite fields: is cyclic of order , generated by Frobenius. Its subgroup lattice is the divisor lattice of , which is the subfield picture from the previous chapter seen through the dictionary.
- Degree 2: always .
- Splitting field of an irreducible cubic: , or when the discriminant is a square.
Solvability by radicals
A polynomial is solvable by radicals its Galois group is a solvable group. is solvable for and not for , because is simple and non-abelian. Hence the general quintic has no formula in radicals, and specific quintics with group — such as — have no radical solution.
This is where the group theory chapters pay off: simplicity of was proved by counting conjugacy classes, and it is the reason for this theorem.
Where intuition breaks
"Every finite extension is Galois." Needs normal and separable. is neither Galois nor normal.
"." Only when Galois. For the degree is and the group is trivial.
"The correspondence preserves inclusions." It reverses them. Bigger field, smaller group; the whole field corresponds to the identity.
"Every intermediate field is normal over ." Only those matching normal subgroups. inside the degree- splitting field is the counterexample, and it is the same fact as its subgroup not being normal.
" is cyclic." It is , which is cyclic exactly when is or . For it is .
" has two intermediate fields." Three — is easy to miss, and the group tells you to look for it.
"Separability is a real constraint here." In characteristic and over finite fields, no. It bites only in characteristic with infinite base fields, such as .
"Solvable group means solvable equation of any degree." Yes — and the point is that is not solvable, not that high degree is inherently unsolvable. has a solvable group and is solvable by radicals.
The exam's angle
- Compute the degree first; the group order equals it if Galois. A mismatch tells you the extension is not.
- Identify the group by its action on roots. For a splitting field of a degree- irreducible, the group embeds in , and the degree pins which subgroup.
- Count intermediate fields by counting subgroups. That is the whole point of the dictionary, and it catches .
- Normal subgroup normal intermediate extension. Questions about normality of a subfield are group questions.
- For solvability, name the group and ask whether it is solvable — for yes, no.
The night before
- Galois normal separable. In characteristic , Galois splitting field.
- iff Galois. : degree , group trivial.
- Fundamental theorem: inclusion-reversing bijection; ; normal , with .
- : degree , group , three intermediate fields including .
- : splitting field degree , group ; matches a non-normal subgroup of order .
- Cyclotomic: , order ; cyclic only for .
- Finite fields: cyclic of order , generated by Frobenius; subgroups match divisors.
- Solvable by radicals solvable Galois group. solvable for only, because is simple.
See it move
The trap here
“Every extension of degree n has a Galois group of order n” — false
has degree 3 but only the identity automorphism
The extension is not normal — the other cube roots are not real. Order = degree only for Galois extensions.
Check yourself — select all that apply
Let and let be the splitting field of f(X) over . Let . Which of the following statements are true?
More in Rings and Fields
Take it further
- The mistake this prevents: hypothesis dropped → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- The mistake this prevents: standard counterexample → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- Previous-year questions set on this — every option and the answer, free:December 2025 · Part CDecember 2024 · Part CDecember 2023 · Part C
Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.
Next: Topological spaces, bases, subspace/product/quotient
Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.
Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 2