Residue theorem and standard contour integrals
Why this is asked: Five standard contour patterns cover almost every exam integral. Know which contour goes with which integrand, and remember that a semicircular indentation contributes iπ·Res, not 2πi·Res.
In one sentence
The residue is the single Laurent coefficient , the residue theorem says a contour integral is times the residues enclosed, and the exam's real content is the handful of standard contours that turn a real integral into that sum.
Why the exam asks it
Because it converts hard real integrals into arithmetic, and because each standard contour has a convergence condition that decides whether the method works at all. A candidate who applies the semicircle without checking the degree condition will get a confident wrong answer, which is exactly what the options are for.
The idea
For an isolated singularity at , is the coefficient in the Laurent expansion on a punctured disc around . It is the only coefficient that survives integration, because for every .
Residue theorem. If is holomorphic inside and on a positively oriented simple closed contour except for finitely many isolated singularities inside, then
Computing residues
- Simple pole: .
- Simple pole of a quotient: if with and having a simple zero at , then . This is the one worth memorising; it avoids factorising the denominator.
- Pole of order :
- Essential singularity: no formula. Expand and read . For the coefficient of is , so the residue is .
Getting wrong is the commonest error — the formula silently returns a number for the wrong rather than failing.
Trigonometric integrals
For , set , so
and the integral becomes a contour integral round . For example , from the single pole inside the unit circle.
Rational integrals over the line
Close with a semicircle in the upper half plane and let . The arc has length , so by ML it vanishes only if the integrand decays faster than :
Condition: .
Then over poles in the upper half plane only. For : the pole at has residue , so the integral is , which is agreeing.
Closing in the lower half plane is equally valid and picks up the other poles with a sign change; the answers agree, and that is a useful check.
Oscillatory integrals
For with , Jordan's lemma allows the weaker condition that on the arc — degree of denominator exceeding numerator by suffices, because decays in the upper half plane.
The sign of decides which half plane to close in. Getting it wrong closes the contour where the exponential grows, and the arc no longer vanishes.
Poles on the contour
has an integrand whose complex counterpart has a pole at the origin, sitting on the path. Indent the contour with a small semicircle around it. A small semicircle around a simple pole contributes — half of , because it turns through half a revolution. The result is .
Note this computes a principal value. converges as an improper Riemann integral, but many principal values exist for integrands that do not converge at all, and the option will not always distinguish them.
Where intuition breaks
"Apply the semicircle to any rational function." Only when the denominator's degree exceeds the numerator's by at least . For the arc does not vanish and the integral does not converge — though its principal value is by symmetry, which is a different claim.
"The residue is the value of the function at the pole." It is the coefficient of . The function has no value at the pole.
"Use the order- formula; if is too big it will still work." Too large an gives a wrong number, not an error — the derivative of a function with a removable singularity is perfectly finite. Establish the order first.
"Count all the poles." Only those inside the contour. Half the options in this topic move a pole across the axis.
"A pole on the contour just contributes its residue." An indentation round a simple pole contributes , not — half the turn, half the contribution. And for a pole of order on the contour the indented integral diverges.
" decays in the upper half plane whatever the sign of ." decays above the axis only for . For , close below.
"The principal value is the integral." It agrees when the integral converges, and exists in many cases where it does not. has principal value and no value.
The exam's angle
- Identify the poles and which are enclosed. That is most of the work; the residues are then mechanical.
- Use for simple poles. It is faster than factorising and it is right whenever has a simple zero.
- Check the decay condition before closing a contour. Degree gap of for rational, with an oscillatory factor via Jordan.
- For , substitute immediately. The unit circle is the contour and .
- Watch for a pole on the real axis — that means an indentation and a factor of , and it means the answer is a principal value.
The night before
- . over enclosed singularities.
- Simple pole: , or for a quotient.
- Order : . Establish first — a wrong returns a number, not an error.
- Essential: expand and read . .
- : put , , integrate round .
- Rational over : semicircle above, denominator degree numerator , count upper-half poles only. .
- With : Jordan, degree gap of suffices, close above for and below for .
- Pole on the contour: indent, and a simple pole contributes . .
- Principal value exists more often than the integral does.
See it move
Check yourself — select all that apply
For an integer k, consider the contour integral eᶻ/zᵏ dz. Which of the following statements are true?
More in Singularities and Residues
Take it further
- The mistake this prevents: execution slip → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- The mistake this prevents: standard counterexample → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- Previous-year questions set on this — every option and the answer, free:December 2025 · Part BDecember 2025 · Part BJune 2025 · Part CDecember 2025 · Part CDecember 2024 · Part BJune 2024 · Part BDecember 2024 · Part CDecember 2023 · Part C
Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.
Next: Argument principle, Rouché's theorem, open mapping
Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.
Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 2