Skip to content
The book

Multivariate normal distribution

Why this is asked: Linear combinations of a multivariate normal are normal — that single fact plus the Wishart quadratic-form rule answers most questions here.

In one sentence

The multivariate normal is closed under every linear operation, its conditionals are normal with a linear mean, and it is the one family where zero correlation really does mean independence.

Why the exam asks it

Because "normal marginals" and "jointly normal" are different conditions and the difference decides the independence question, and because the conditional-distribution formula is quotable and therefore examinable.

The idea

X∼Np(μ,Σ)\mathbf{X}\sim N_p(\boldsymbol\mu,\Sigma) has density

f(x)=1(2π)p/2∣Σ∣1/2exp⁡(−12(x−μ)′Σ−1(x−μ))f(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{p/2}|\Sigma|^{1/2}}\exp\left(-\tfrac12(\mathbf{x}-\boldsymbol\mu)'\Sigma^{-1}(\mathbf{x}-\boldsymbol\mu)\right)

when Σ\Sigma is positive definite. If Σ\Sigma is singular the distribution is degenerate — it lives on a lower-dimensional subspace and has no density, which happens exactly when a linear combination of the components is constant.

The cleanest definition avoids the density: X\mathbf{X} is multivariate normal iff a′X\mathbf{a}'\mathbf{X} is univariate normal for every vector a\mathbf{a}. That formulation covers the degenerate case and makes the closure properties obvious.

The properties

  • Linear transformations: AX+b∼N(Aμ+b,AΣA′)A\mathbf{X}+\mathbf{b}\sim N(A\boldsymbol\mu+\mathbf{b}, A\Sigma A'). Any linear map of a normal vector is normal.
  • Marginals are normal — take AA to select coordinates.
  • Conditionals are normal: X1∣X2=x2∼N(μ1+Σ12Σ22−1(x2−μ2), Σ11−Σ12Σ22−1Σ21).\mathbf{X}_1\mid\mathbf{X}_2=\mathbf{x}_2 \sim N\left(\boldsymbol\mu_1 + \Sigma_{12}\Sigma_{22}^{-1}(\mathbf{x}_2-\boldsymbol\mu_2),\ \Sigma_{11}-\Sigma_{12}\Sigma_{22}^{-1}\Sigma_{21}\right). The mean is linear in the conditioning value and the variance does not depend on it — which is exactly the linear-regression model, and the reason regression and the multivariate normal are the same subject.
  • Uncorrelated implies independent: Σ\Sigma block-diagonal makes the density factor. This is the exception to the general rule from the joint-distributions chapter.
  • Quadratic form: (X−μ)′Σ−1(X−μ)∼χp2(\mathbf{X}-\boldsymbol\mu)'\Sigma^{-1}(\mathbf{X}-\boldsymbol\mu)\sim\chi^2_p — the squared Mahalanobis distance, and the basis of confidence ellipsoids.

In the bivariate case with correlation ρ\rho, the conditional variance is σ12(1−ρ2)\sigma_1^2(1-\rho^2): conditioning removes the fraction ρ2\rho^2 of the variance, which is exactly R2R^2 in the one-predictor regression.

The trap

Normal marginals do not imply joint normality. The standard construction: take (X,Y)(X,Y) standard bivariate normal with ρ=0\rho=0, then flip the sign of YY whenever XY<0XY<0. Both marginals remain standard normal, the pair is uncorrelated, and they are strongly dependent — YY's sign is determined by XX's.

So "uncorrelated normals are independent" is false as usually stated. The correct statement needs joint normality, and options omit the word.

Where intuition breaks

"Normal marginals means jointly normal." False, and it is the hypothesis the independence result depends on.

"Uncorrelated normals are independent." Only if jointly normal.

"Every multivariate normal has a density." Singular Σ\Sigma gives a degenerate distribution on a subspace, with no density.

"The conditional variance depends on the conditioning value." It does not — that is the homoscedasticity assumption of linear regression, and here it is a theorem rather than an assumption.

"Σ\Sigma can be any symmetric matrix." It must be positive semi-definite. A symmetric matrix with a negative eigenvalue is not a covariance matrix.

"A linear combination of normals is normal." Of jointly normal components. Two separately normal variables can have a non-normal sum.

"The Mahalanobis distance is chi-square with p−1p-1 degrees of freedom." pp, when μ\mu and Σ\Sigma are known. Estimating them changes the distribution — that is Hotelling's T2T^2.

The exam's angle

  1. Use the linear-combination definition — it settles closure questions immediately.
  2. For conditionals, quote the formula and note the variance is free of the conditioning value.
  3. Check ∣Σ∣|\Sigma| — zero means degenerate, and questions use that to test whether a density exists.
  4. When independence is claimed from zero correlation, look for "jointly".
  5. For confidence regions, use the chi-square quadratic form with pp degrees of freedom.

The night before

  • X\mathbf{X} is multivariate normal iff every a′X\mathbf{a}'\mathbf{X} is univariate normal.
  • AX+b∼N(Aμ+b,AΣA′)A\mathbf{X}+\mathbf{b}\sim N(A\mu+\mathbf{b}, A\Sigma A'); marginals normal.
  • Conditional: mean μ1+Σ12Σ22−1(x2−μ2)\mu_1+\Sigma_{12}\Sigma_{22}^{-1}(\mathbf{x}_2-\mu_2), variance Σ11−Σ12Σ22−1Σ21\Sigma_{11}-\Sigma_{12}\Sigma_{22}^{-1}\Sigma_{21} — free of x2\mathbf{x}_2.
  • Bivariate: conditional variance σ12(1−ρ2)\sigma_1^2(1-\rho^2).
  • Uncorrelated ⇒\Rightarrow independent, for jointly normal only. Normal marginals are not enough.
  • Singular Σ\Sigma ⇒\Rightarrow degenerate, no density.
  • (X−μ)′Σ−1(X−μ)∼χp2(\mathbf{X}-\mu)'\Sigma^{-1}(\mathbf{X}-\mu)\sim\chi^2_p.

See it move

Zero correlation and independence: when they coincideinteractive

This visual is part of Trap Analysis

The equivalence holds under joint normality and fails without it — with the standard counterexample.

Unlock interactive visuals

The trap here

“If every marginal is normal then the vector is multivariate normal” — false

X ~ N(0,1) and Y=εXY = \varepsilon{}X with ε=±1\varepsilon = \pm1 independent

Both marginals are N(0,1) but X + Y is 0 half the time — not normal, so the pair is not jointly normal.

More on this →

Check yourself

Let X=(X1,X2)TX = (X_{1}, X_{2})^{T} be bivariate normal with mean (0, 0)ᵀ and covariance ∑=[[5,−3],[−3,10]]\sum = [[5, -3], [-3, 10]]. The mean vector and covariance matrix of Y=(X1,5−2X2)TY = (X_{1}, 5 - 2X_{2})^{T} are

More in Linear Models and Multivariate

Take it further

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

Next: SRS, stratified and systematic sampling

Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram

Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 4