Let X be an uncountable subset of and let be an entire function. Assume that for every z ∈ X there exists an integer n ≥ 1 such that = 0. Which of the following statements are necessarily true?
Part CCSIR NET December 2023identity-theorem-pigeonhole
Identity theorem pigeonhole
Related counterexample: A bounded holomorphic function on an unbounded domain is constant
- liouville obstructionDecember 2023
- a fractional growth rate rounds to an integer both timesDecember 2024
- omitting a disc invites liouville on the reciprocalDecember 2024
- vacuous hypothesisJune 2024
- bounded below means liouville on the reciprocalJune 2024
- level sets are discrete but f may not vanishJune 2024
The chapter behind this: Liouville, Morera and the maximum principle — free to read
From Cauchy Theory › Liouville, Morera, maximum modulus principle
Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.