Skip to content
Part BCSIR NET December 2023sufficient-statistic-by-expansion

Sufficient statistic by expansion

For n ≥ 2, let ε1,…,εn\varepsilon_{1}, \dots, \varepsilon_{n} be i.i.d.N(0,σ2)i.i.d. N(0, \sigma^{2}) and Yi=iα+i2α2+εiY_{i} = i\alpha + i^{2}\alpha^{2} + \varepsilon_{i}, where σ>0\sigma > 0 and α∈R\alpha \in \mathbb{R} are unknown. Which of the following is a jointly minimal sufficient statistic for (α,σ)(\alpha, \sigma)?

  1. A.(∑Yi2,∑(\sum{}Y_{i}^{2}, \sum iYi,∑i2Yi)_{i}, \sum i^{2}Y_{i})✓ Correct
  2. B.(∑Yi2,∑(\sum{}Y_{i}^{2}, \sum iYi,∑i2Yi2)_{i}, \sum i^{2}Y_{i}^{2})
  3. C.(∑(\sum iYi,∑i2Yi2)_{i}, \sum i^{2}Y_{i}^{2})
  4. D.(∑Yi,∑(\sum{}Y_{i}, \sum iYi)_{i})

You have the answer. Trap Analysis is why the other three were written.

Not a worked solution repeated four times — the specific reasoning error each wrong option was built to reward, and why this one tests what the inference means.

See pricing

50 are analysed free — try those first.

The trap it tests

What the inference means

p-values, size, power and error types say specific things. This was not one of them.

Drill statements like this

Related counterexample: A sufficient statistic is complete

More on this topic

The chapter behind this: Sufficiency, completeness and the UMVUE machine — free to read

From Estimation › Sufficiency, completeness, UMVUE, Cramér–Rao

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram