Skip to content
Part CCSIR NET December 2024the-radial-inertia-term-vanishes-with-r-dot

The radial inertia term vanishes with r dot

Consider a particle of mass m which is moving on a surface due to gravity. Suppose the Lagrangian of the particle in the cylindrical coordinates is given by L=(m/2)[(1+4α2r2)L = (m/2)[(1 + 4\alpha^{2}r^{2})ṙ2+r2θ^{2} + r^{2}\thetȧ2]−mα^{2}] - m\alphagr2^{2}, where α\alpha is a positive constant, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. If the particle is in circular motion, then

  1. A.|θ\thetȧ| =2/(gα)= \sqrt{2/(g\alpha)}
  2. B.|θ\thetȧ| =1/(gα)= \sqrt{1/(g\alpha)}
  3. C.|θ\thetȧ| =2gα= \sqrt{2g\alpha}✓ Correct
  4. D.|θ\thetȧ| =gα= \sqrt{g\alpha}

You have the answer. Trap Analysis is why the other three were written.

Not a worked solution repeated four times — the specific reasoning error each wrong option was built to reward, and why this one tests hypothesis dropped.

See pricing

50 are analysed free — try those first.

The trap it tests

Hypothesis dropped

A theorem applied without checking one of its preconditions.

Drill statements like this

Related counterexample: The generalised momentum ∂L/∂q̇ always equals mass × velocity

More on this topic

The chapter behind this: Lagrangian mechanics — free to read

From Classical Mechanics › Lagrangian formalism and generalised coordinates

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram