In plain words
A topology is a decision about which sets count as open. The surprise is the infinite product, where the useful topology is the one restricting all but finitely many coordinates.
Bases and comparison
A collection ℬ is a base iff it covers X and for ℬ and there is ℬ with .
is finer than if . Discrete is the finest, indiscrete the coarsest.
| Topology on | Finer than usual? |
|---|---|
| discrete | yes, strictly |
| Sorgenfrey (lower limit, [a,b)) | yes, strictly |
| usual | — |
| cofinite | no, strictly coarser |
| indiscrete | strictly coarser |
The constructions
- Subspace: open sets are U ∩ A.
- Product (Tychonoff): base with for all but finitely many i. The box topology drops "finitely many" and is strictly finer on infinite products.
- Quotient: U open in X/∼ iff its preimage is open. Quotients need not be Hausdorff even if X is.
Why the product topology wins: Tychonoff's theorem (arbitrary products of compact spaces are compact) is false for the box topology, and projections are continuous and open for the product topology.
Closure, interior, boundary
- cl(A) = A ∪ A′; A is closed ⇔ A = cl A; A is dense ⇔ cl A = X.
- int(A ∩ B) = int A ∩ int B, but int(A ∪ B) ⊇ int A ∪ int B can be strict ∖.
- cl(A ∪ B) = cl A ∪ cl B, but cl(A ∩ B) ⊆ cl A ∩ cl B can be strict (same example).
Key takeaways
- Product ≠ box on infinite products, and Tychonoff needs the product topology.
- Closure distributes over finite unions, interior over finite intersections — not the other way.
- Quotients destroy Hausdorff; subspaces and products preserve it.