Root finding: bisection, Newton–Raphson, fixed point, order of convergence
Why this is asked: Order of convergence is the whole topic: bisection 1, secant φ ≈ 1.618, Newton 2 (but only 1 at a multiple root), fixed point 1 unless g′(r) = 0.
In one sentence
Bisection is slow and certain, Newton is fast and unguaranteed, and Newton's famous quadratic rate holds only at a simple root.
Why the exam asks it
Because "order of convergence" is a precise notion with a small number of standard answers, and because the multiple-root case is a clean way to test whether the quadratic claim was memorised or understood.
The idea
A method has order if the errors satisfy . Order with is linear; order means the number of correct digits roughly doubles each step.
Bisection
Needs continuous with . Then a root exists by the intermediate value theorem and the interval halves each step, so after steps the error is at most .
Order with — slow, and the only method here that cannot fail. Ten steps gain a factor of , so about decimal places.
Fixed point iteration
Rewrite as and iterate . If near the root, the iteration converges linearly with ; if it diverges however good the starting point.
The same equation admits many rearrangements with different , and the choice decides convergence. That is why the question is usually "which of these iterations converges" rather than "does it".
When the convergence is faster than linear — and Newton is exactly that case.
Newton–Raphson
At a simple root with continuous, convergence is quadratic, with . Starting from for : , then , whose square exceeds by only — the error squaring visibly.
At a root of multiplicity it is linear, with factor . For from the iterates are , , : the error halves rather than squares, and . Using restores the quadratic rate, and that modification is a standard question.
Newton has no convergence guarantee. It fails when , when the iterates cycle — the classic being from , which alternates between and forever — and when a bad start sends it away entirely. Guaranteed convergence needs a hypothesis such as convex and monotone on an interval containing the root.
Secant
Order , the golden ratio, which satisfies — that equation coming directly from the error recurrence. Slower than Newton per step, but needs no derivative, so it is often faster in work done.
Where intuition breaks
"Newton always converges." It has no guarantee. Bisection is the one that cannot fail, and it is the slow one — the trade is the point.
"Newton is quadratic." At a simple root. At a double root it is linear with factor , which is barely better than bisection.
"A faster order always means fewer steps in practice." Order describes behaviour near the root. A method may not get near it at all, and Newton's failures are all far from the root.
"Fixed point iteration converges if somewhere." Near the root, and the iterates must stay in that neighbourhood. Options weaken this to a single point or to the whole line.
"Any rearrangement will do." For , has and the iteration cycles between two values forever. is Newton and converges quadratically. Same equation, different behaviour.
"Bisection needs differentiability." Continuity and a sign change. It is the method with the weakest hypotheses.
"The secant method has order 2 since it approximates Newton." . The approximation to costs the difference.
The exam's angle
- Check the multiplicity before claiming a rate. A repeated factor turns Newton linear, and that is the commonest trick in this topic.
- For fixed point questions, differentiate at the root and compare with .
- Count bisection steps with — the answer is a logarithm and it is usually asked directly.
- Remember the orders: bisection , fixed point , secant , Newton , Newton at a root of multiplicity back to .
- If asked when Newton fails, name a mechanism — vanishing derivative, cycling, or a bad start — rather than saying it always works.
The night before
- Order : . Linear is with .
- Bisection: needs continuity and a sign change, error , order , never fails.
- Fixed point: converges iff near the root, linearly with .
- Newton: quadratic at a simple root, . Linear with factor at a root of multiplicity ; restores quadratic.
- Newton fails at , by cycling ( from ), or from a bad start.
- Secant: order , no derivative needed.
- : cycles, is Newton.
See it move
The trap here
“Newton's method converges quadratically to any root” — false
at the root 0
The root is double: ₊, only linear convergence.
More in Numerical Analysis
Take it further
- The mistake this prevents: numerical convergence → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- The mistake this prevents: converse assumed → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- Previous-year questions set on this — every option and the answer, free:December 2025 · Part CDecember 2025 · Part CDecember 2024 · Part BDecember 2024 · Part CJune 2024 · Part C
Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.
Next: Interpolation and numerical integration with error terms
Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.
Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 3