Skip to content
Part CCSIR NET December 2023comparing-test-statistics

Comparing test statistics

Let X1,…,X25X_{1}, \dots, X_{25} be i.i.d. Bernoulli(p), X̄ their mean, T1=5(Xˉ−0.5)/Xˉ(1−Xˉ)T_{1} = 5({\bar{X}} - 0.5)/\sqrt{{\bar{X}}(1 - {\bar{X}})} for 0 < X̄ < 1 (±5 at the endpoints) and T2=10(Xˉ−0.5)T_{2} = 10({\bar{X}} - 0.5). For H0:p=0.5H_{0}: p = 0.5 vs H1:p>0.5H_{1}: p > 0.5, test ψi\psi_{i} rejects iff Ti>2T_{i} > 2. If the observed X̄ ∈ (0.5, 0.75), which of the following statements are true?

  1. A.If ψ1\psi_{1} rejects H0H_{0}, then ψ2\psi_{2} also rejects H0H_{0}
  2. B.If ψ1\psi_{1} does not reject H0H_{0}, then ψ2\psi_{2} also does not reject H0H_{0}✓ Correct
  3. C.If ψ2\psi_{2} rejects H0H_{0}, then ψ1\psi_{1} also rejects H0H_{0}✓ Correct
  4. D.If ψ2\psi_{2} does not reject H0H_{0}, then ψ1\psi_{1} also does not reject H0H_{0}

You have the answer. Trap Analysis is why the other three were written.

Not a worked solution repeated four times — the specific reasoning error each wrong option was built to reward, and why this one tests what the inference means.

See pricing

50 are analysed free — try those first.

The trap it tests

What the inference means

p-values, size, power and error types say specific things. This was not one of them.

Drill statements like this

Related counterexample: A UMP test exists for every testing problem

More on this topic

The chapter behind this: Neyman–Pearson and UMP tests — free to read

From Hypothesis Testing › Neyman–Pearson lemma and UMP tests

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram