Skip to content
Part CCSIR NET June 2023p-squared-groups-abelian-not-cyclic

P squared groups abelian not cyclic

Let G be a group of order 2023. Which of the following statements are true?

  1. A.G is an Abelian group.✓ Correct
  2. B.G is a cyclic group.
  3. C.G is a simple group.
  4. D.G is not a simple group.✓ Correct

The idea, in plain words

Factor the order and count the possible numbers of subgroups of each prime power size. Both counts are forced to be one, so both such subgroups are normal, the group splits as their product, and each piece is abelian — so the whole thing is.

Solution

2023=7⋅172.n7≡1(mod7)2023 = 7 \cdot 17^{2}. n_{7} \equiv 1 (mod 7) and n7n_{7} | 289⇒n7=1;n17289 \Rightarrow n_{7} = 1; n_{17} | 7 and ≡1(mod17)⇒n17=1\equiv 1 (mod 17) \Rightarrow n_{17} = 1.

So G≅Z7×PG \cong \mathbb{Z}_{7} \times P with P of order 17217^{2} abelian: G is abelian and not simple.

P may be Z17×Z17\mathbb{Z}_{17} \times \mathbb{Z}_{17}

so G need not be cyclic.

Why each option is right or wrong

Checked against 5 symbolic computations
  • A.Correct

    True.

    SymPy factors 2023 as 7⋅1727 \cdot 17^{2}.

    Sylow: n7n_{7} divides 289 and is ≡ 1 mod 7

    but the divisors of 289 are 1, 17, 289 (verified) with 17 ≡ 3 and 289 ≡ 2 mod 7 — so n7=1n_{7} = 1.

    Likewise n17n_{17} divides 7 and is ≡ 1 mod 17

    but 7 ≡ 7 mod 17

    so n17=1n_{17} = 1.

    Both Sylow subgroups are normal and intersect trivially

    so G≅Z7×PG \cong \mathbb{Z}_{7} \times P with |P| =172= 17^{2}.

    Every group of order p2p^{2} is abelian

    so G is abelian.

    The trigger: when every Sylow count is forced to 1, the group is the direct product of its Sylow subgroups.

  • False — 'need not be' is the point.

    P has order 17217^{2} and may be Z17×Z17\mathbb{Z}_{17} \times \mathbb{Z}_{17} rather than Z289\mathbb{Z}_{289}, in which case G≅Z7×Z17×Z17G \cong \mathbb{Z}_{7} \times \mathbb{Z}_{17} \times \mathbb{Z}_{17} has no element of order 2023.

    Abelian does not imply cyclic once a prime appears squared; Z7×Z289\mathbb{Z}_{7} \times \mathbb{Z}_{289} is cyclic but it is not the only option.

  • C.Wrong

    False.

    Both Sylow subgroups are normal and proper

    so G has non-trivial normal subgroups.

    A simple group of non-prime order would need every Sylow count greater than 1, and here the arithmetic forbids it.

  • D.Correct

    True, and it follows immediately from (A) — an abelian group of composite order is never simple

    since every subgroup is normal.

    More directly, the normal Sylow 7-subgroup is a proper non-trivial normal subgroup.

    Note that (C) and (D) are exact negations

    so exactly one of them had to be correct.

1 of these 2 wrong options correspond to a named reasoning error — the same errors recur across subjects.

The trap it tests

Invariants don't determine

Two objects sharing an invariant were treated as the same object.

Drill statements like this

Related counterexample: A group of order pq (p < q) is always cyclic

More on this topic

The chapter behind this: Sylow theorems and classifying small groups — free to read

From Groups › Sylow theorems and groups of small order

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram