NETMaths
The bookUnit 2 · Groups42 / 83

Sylow theorems and groups of small order

Why this is asked: n_p ≡ 1 (mod p) and n_p | m is the whole toolkit. Use it to force a normal Sylow subgroup and prove non-simplicity, or to classify groups of small order.

The three theorems

Let |G| = pᵏm with p ∤ m.

  1. Existence: Sylow p-subgroups (order pᵏ) exist.
  2. Conjugacy: all are conjugate; every p-subgroup lies in one.
  3. Counting: n_p ≡ 1 (mod p) and n_p | m. Also n_p = [G : N(P)].

n_p = 1 ⇔ the Sylow p-subgroup is normal.

The standard drill

|G| Conclusion
pq, p < q, p ∤ q−1 cyclic
pq, p | q−1 Zpq\mathbb{Z}_{pq} or the non-abelian semidirect product
p2p^{2} abelian: Zp2\mathbb{Z}_{p^{2}} or Zp×Zp\mathbb{Z}_p \times \mathbb{Z}_p
15 = 3·5 n3=n5=1n_{3} = n_{5} = 1 \Rightarrow cyclic
20 = 4·5 n51(mod5),n5n_{5} \equiv 1 (mod 5), n_{5} | 4n5=14 \Rightarrow n_{5} = 1
2023=71722023 = 7\cdot17^{2} n7=n17=1n_{7} = n_{17} = 1 \Rightarrow abelian, not simple
30 = 2·3·5 n3=1n_{3} = 1 or n5=1(n_{5} = 1 (counting elements) ⇒ not simple
36, 48, 24 use the coset action: index too small ⇒ not simple

Counting-elements argument

If n_q = k > 1 with q prime, the Sylow q-subgroups contribute k(q − 1) elements of order q. Adding up over primes and exceeding |G| gives a contradiction — the standard proof that no group of order 30 is simple.

Normal Sylow ⇒ direct product

If every Sylow subgroup is normal, G is the direct product of them (a nilpotent group). Finite abelian groups and p-groups are the examples.

Key takeaways

  • n_p ≡ 1 (mod p) and n_p | m — apply to each prime in turn.
  • One normal Sylow subgroup kills simplicity immediately.
  • All Sylow subgroups normal ⇒ G is their direct product.

See it move

Sylow counting: proving a group is not simpleinteractive

The standard argument, run on order 12 and order 15 — including the element count that finishes it.

Unlock interactive visuals

The trap here

“A group of order pq (p < q) is always cyclic” — false

S3S_{3} of order 6 = 2·3

Non-abelian because 2 | 3 − 1. The cyclic conclusion needs p ∤ q − 1.

More on this →

Check yourself — select all that apply

Let G be a group of order 2023. Which of the following statements are true?

Next: Finite abelian groups

Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.

Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 2