Sylow theorems and groups of small order
Why this is asked: n_p ≡ 1 (mod p) and n_p | m is the whole toolkit. Use it to force a normal Sylow subgroup and prove non-simplicity, or to classify groups of small order.
In one sentence
Sylow's counting conditions usually pin down enough structure to classify a group from its order alone, and when they do not, counting elements of prime order finishes the job.
Why the exam asks it
Because "is every group of order abelian / cyclic / simple" is a question with a short mechanical answer, and because the two Sylow conditions have to be used together. Options routinely satisfy one and quietly fail the other.
The idea
With and : Sylow -subgroups have order , they all exist, they are all conjugate, and
the Sylow -subgroup is normal, since conjugacy of all of them means a solitary one is fixed.
The standard route to non-simplicity
- Find a forcing . Often the congruence and the divisibility have only the solution in common. Then there is a proper non-trivial normal subgroup and is not simple.
- If not, count elements. Distinct Sylow -subgroups of prime order intersect trivially, so of them contribute elements of order . Add up over primes; if the total exceeds , some must be .
- If that fails, act on the Sylow subgroups. acts by conjugation on the Sylow -subgroups, giving . If the map has a non-trivial kernel, which is a normal subgroup.
Order 30. Suppose simple, so and . Then with gives , contributing elements of order . And with gives , contributing elements of order . That is elements in a group of . Contradiction.
Order , primes. and ; since the only option is , so the Sylow -subgroup is normal and is a semidirect product.
- If , then too and is cyclic.
- If , there is exactly one non-abelian group as well.
So order () is forced cyclic, and order () admits a non-abelian group.
No simple group of order less than except the primes. at is the first, which is why appears so often.
Groups of small order
Order has five groups: three abelian (, , ) and two non-abelian (, ). Counting elements of order separates all five — respectively. and have the same order, the same centre size, the same abelianisation, and differ exactly there: has a unique element of order , namely .
Useful general facts:
- Order : cyclic. Order : abelian, so or .
- Order : or .
- A group whose every non-identity element has order is elementary abelian, hence .
- Index of the smallest prime: a subgroup of index , the smallest prime dividing , is normal. This generalises the index- fact and closes several small-order arguments.
Where intuition breaks
", so ." Both conditions are needed, and often several values survive. Order has and both occur.
", so is cyclic." Only when . Order has a non-abelian group; order does not. Checking that divisibility is the question.
"A normal Sylow subgroup makes abelian." It makes a semidirect product. has a normal Sylow -subgroup — itself — and is not abelian.
"Two groups with the same order, centre and abelianisation are isomorphic." and agree on all three. Counting elements of each order is the invariant that separates them.
" has a subgroup of index , so it is normal." Only when is the smallest prime dividing . In , index subgroups exist and is not smallest.
"Order means simple." is simple; is not. Order does not determine simplicity, and the correct statement is that is the smallest order admitting a non-abelian simple group.
"If for every , then is simple." It only means the Sylow subgroups are not normal. Normal subgroups can arise elsewhere — from the kernel of the action on Sylow subgroups, for instance.
The exam's angle
- Factor and tabulate the possible using both conditions at once.
- If any is forced to , you are done — not simple, and you have a normal subgroup to build a semidirect product with.
- Otherwise count elements of prime order. each; exceeding is the contradiction.
- Then try the action on Sylow subgroups and compare with .
- For classification, count elements of each order. It is the cheapest complete invariant for small groups and it is what separates from .
The night before
- and . normal Sylow -subgroup.
- Non-simplicity: force ; else count elements; else act on the Sylow subgroups and use .
- Order : and need elements. Not simple.
- Order , : always. Cyclic . Order cyclic, order not necessarily.
- Smallest non-abelian simple group is , order . Nothing simple below except primes.
- Order : , , , , . Elements of order : .
- A subgroup of index the smallest prime dividing is normal.
See it move
The trap here
“A group of order pq (p < q) is always cyclic” — false
of order 6 = 2·3
Non-abelian because 2 | 3 − 1. The cyclic conclusion needs p ∤ q − 1.
Check yourself — select all that apply
Let G be a group of order 2023. Which of the following statements are true?
More in Groups
Take it further
- The mistake this prevents: invariants don't determine → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- The mistake this prevents: standard counterexample → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- Previous-year questions set on this — every option and the answer, free:December 2025 · Part CDecember 2024 · Part CJune 2023 · Part C
Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.
Next: Finite abelian groups
Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.
Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 2