Sylow theorems and groups of small order
Why this is asked: n_p ≡ 1 (mod p) and n_p | m is the whole toolkit. Use it to force a normal Sylow subgroup and prove non-simplicity, or to classify groups of small order.
The three theorems
Let |G| = pᵏm with p ∤ m.
- Existence: Sylow p-subgroups (order pᵏ) exist.
- Conjugacy: all are conjugate; every p-subgroup lies in one.
- Counting: n_p ≡ 1 (mod p) and n_p | m. Also n_p = [G : N(P)].
n_p = 1 ⇔ the Sylow p-subgroup is normal.
The standard drill
| |G| | Conclusion |
|---|---|
| pq, p < q, p ∤ q−1 | cyclic |
| pq, p | q−1 | or the non-abelian semidirect product |
| abelian: or | |
| 15 = 3·5 | cyclic |
| 20 = 4·5 | | |
| abelian, not simple | |
| 30 = 2·3·5 | or counting elements) ⇒ not simple |
| 36, 48, 24 | use the coset action: index too small ⇒ not simple |
Counting-elements argument
If n_q = k > 1 with q prime, the Sylow q-subgroups contribute k(q − 1) elements of order q. Adding up over primes and exceeding |G| gives a contradiction — the standard proof that no group of order 30 is simple.
Normal Sylow ⇒ direct product
If every Sylow subgroup is normal, G is the direct product of them (a nilpotent group). Finite abelian groups and p-groups are the examples.
Key takeaways
- n_p ≡ 1 (mod p) and n_p | m — apply to each prime in turn.
- One normal Sylow subgroup kills simplicity immediately.
- All Sylow subgroups normal ⇒ G is their direct product.
See it move
The trap here
“A group of order pq (p < q) is always cyclic” — false
of order 6 = 2·3
Non-abelian because 2 | 3 − 1. The cyclic conclusion needs p ∤ q − 1.
Check yourself — select all that apply
Let G be a group of order 2023. Which of the following statements are true?
Next: Finite abelian groups
Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.
Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 2