Skip to content
The book

Normal subgroups, quotients, isomorphism theorems

Why this is asked: Normality is not transitive. Know the standard normal/non-normal examples in S₄ and A₄, and that index-2 subgroups are always normal.

In one sentence

Normal subgroups are exactly the kernels, quotients exist exactly for them, and the property that catches people is that normality is a relation between two groups rather than something a subgroup possesses.

Why the exam asks it

Because "normal" gets treated as an adjective attached to a subgroup, and it is not — it is always normal in something. That misreading produces the transitivity error, which is set often and has a small concrete counterexample.

The idea

N≤GN \le G is normal, written N⊴GN \trianglelefteq G, if gNg−1=NgNg^{-1} = N for every g∈Gg \in G; equivalently every left coset is a right coset.

Normality is exactly what makes the coset multiplication (aN)(bN)=abN(aN)(bN) = abN well defined, so the quotient group G/NG/N exists precisely for normal NN.

Sufficient conditions worth recognising:

  • Index 22 ⇒\Rightarrow normal.
  • Any subgroup of an abelian group.
  • The centre Z(G)Z(G), and more generally any subgroup of the centre.
  • Kernels: ker⁡φ⊴G\ker\varphi \trianglelefteq G for every homomorphism, and conversely every normal subgroup is the kernel of the quotient map. Normal subgroups and kernels are the same objects.

The isomorphism theorems

First. G/ker⁡φ≅im⁡φG/\ker\varphi \cong \operatorname{im}\varphi. This is the one that does the work: to identify a quotient, find a homomorphism with that kernel and look at its image.

Second. For H≤GH \le G and N⊴GN \trianglelefteq G: HN/N≅H/(H∩N)HN/N \cong H/(H\cap N).

Third. For N≤MN \le M both normal in GG: (G/N)/(M/N)≅G/M(G/N)/(M/N) \cong G/M.

Correspondence. Subgroups of G/NG/N correspond exactly to subgroups of GG containing NN, and normality is preserved both ways. This is how questions about a quotient's subgroup structure are answered without constructing anything.

Normality is not transitive

D₄, order 8 index 2, so normal H = {e, r², s, r²s} H is abelian, so normal N = {e, s} not normal in D₄: r s r⁻¹ = r²s ∉ N N ⊴ H ⊴ G does not give N ⊴ G. Normality is a relation between two groups, not a property of one.
Each subgroup is normal in the next, and the smallest is not normal in the largest. Normality is a relation between two groups, not a property one group carries.

In D4=⟨r,s:r4=s2=e,  srs=r−1⟩D_4 = \langle r,s : r^4 = s^2 = e,\; srs = r^{-1}\rangle of order 88:

  • H={e,r2,s,r2s}H = \{e, r^2, s, r^2s\} has index 22, so H⊴D4H \trianglelefteq D_4.
  • N={e,s}≤HN = \{e, s\} \le H, and HH is abelian, so N⊴HN \trianglelefteq H.
  • But rsr−1=r2s∉Nrsr^{-1} = r^2 s \notin N, so NN is not normal in D4D_4.

N⊴H⊴GN \trianglelefteq H \trianglelefteq G does not give N⊴GN \trianglelefteq G. The reason is visible in the definition: normality of NN in HH constrains conjugation by elements of HH only, and GG has more elements.

The property that is transitive is being characteristic — preserved by every automorphism. Characteristic in normal gives normal, which is the correct repair.

Simple groups and solvability

GG is simple if its only normal subgroups are {e}\{e\} and GG. The abelian simple groups are exactly CpC_p. The smallest non-abelian simple group is A5A_5, of order 6060, and AnA_n is simple for every n≥5n \ge 5 — which is what makes the general quintic unsolvable.

The commutator subgroup [G,G][G,G] is the smallest normal subgroup with abelian quotient: G/NG/N is abelian   ⟺  [G,G]≤N\iff [G,G] \le N. So G/[G,G]G/[G,G] is the largest abelian quotient.

Where intuition breaks

"N⊴HN \trianglelefteq H and H⊴GH \trianglelefteq G, so N⊴GN \trianglelefteq G." D4D_4 as above. The topic's central error, and it comes from reading "normal" as a property rather than a relation.

"G/NG/N abelian and NN abelian, so GG abelian." S3S_3 with N=A3N = A_3: both A3A_3 and S3/A3≅C2S_3/A_3 \cong C_2 are abelian, and S3S_3 is not. An abelian quotient of an abelian subgroup says the group is solvable, not abelian.

"A quotient of a non-abelian group is non-abelian." S3/A3≅C2S_3/A_3 \cong C_2. Quotients lose information, which is the point of them.

"Every subgroup is a kernel." Only the normal ones. ⟨(1 2)⟩\langle(1\,2)\rangle in S3S_3 is not the kernel of anything.

"G/N≅HG/N \cong H means G≅N×HG \cong N \times H." Far from it. C4/C2≅C2C_4/C_2 \cong C_2 and C4≇C2×C2C_4 \not\cong C_2\times C_2. A quotient being a group does not split the extension.

"Normal subgroups commute elementwise with everything." gN=NggN = Ng as sets, not gn=nggn = ng for each nn. Elementwise commuting is the centre, which is a much stronger condition.

"A4A_4 is simple because A5A_5 is." A4A_4 has the Klein four-group as a normal subgroup. Simplicity of AnA_n starts at n=5n = 5.

The exam's angle

  1. To identify a quotient, build a homomorphism. The first isomorphism theorem turns "what is G/NG/N" into "what does a map with kernel NN hit", which is usually visible.
  2. Check normality by conjugating a generator. One element that escapes settles it, as rsr−1rsr^{-1} does above.
  3. Index 2, centre, kernel — all normal for free. Recognising one of these is often the whole step.
  4. For transitivity claims, look for the D4D_4 shape: a reflection inside a Klein subgroup.
  5. Use the correspondence theorem for questions about subgroups of a quotient rather than constructing cosets.

The night before

  • N⊴G  ⟺  gNg−1=N  ⟺  N \trianglelefteq G \iff gNg^{-1} = N \iff every left coset is a right coset   ⟺  \iff NN is a kernel.
  • Index 22, the centre, and any subgroup of an abelian group are normal.
  • First isomorphism theorem: G/ker⁡φ≅im⁡φG/\ker\varphi \cong \operatorname{im}\varphi. Second: HN/N≅H/(H∩N)HN/N \cong H/(H\cap N). Third: (G/N)/(M/N)≅G/M(G/N)/(M/N)\cong G/M.
  • Normality is not transitive: {e,s}⊴{e,r2,s,r2s}⊴D4\{e,s\} \trianglelefteq \{e,r^2,s,r^2s\} \trianglelefteq D_4, and rsr−1=r2srsr^{-1} = r^2s. Characteristic-in-normal is the repair.
  • NN and G/NG/N abelian does not give GG abelian — S3S_3 and A3A_3. It gives solvable.
  • G/NG/N abelian   ⟺  [G,G]≤N\iff [G,G] \le N.
  • Simple: only {e}\{e\} and GG normal. Abelian simple == CpC_p. AnA_n simple for n≥5n\ge5; ∣A5∣=60|A_5| = 60 is the smallest non-abelian one. A4A_4 is not simple.

See it move

The first isomorphism theorem, used as a toolinteractive

This visual is part of Trap Analysis

Three quotients identified in one line each — the fastest way to answer 'what is G/N?'

Unlock interactive visuals

The trap here

“Converse of Lagrange: d | |G| ⇒ subgroup of order d” — false

A4A_{4} has no subgroup of order 6

More on this →

Check yourself — select all that apply

Which of the following statements are true?

More in Groups

Take it further

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

Next: Permutation groups: cycles, sign, conjugacy in S_n and A_n

Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram

Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 2