Skip to content
The book

Subgroups, cosets, Lagrange, cyclic groups

Why this is asked: Lagrange gives one direction only. The exam tests the failures: no subgroup of a given order (A₄), and 'union of proper subgroups ⇔ not cyclic'.

In one sentence

Lagrange says the order of a subgroup divides the order of the group, the converse is false, and A4A_4 having no subgroup of order 66 is the fact the whole topic is built to test.

Why the exam asks it

Because Lagrange is the first real theorem in group theory and its converse is the first real trap. "dd divides ∣G∣|G|, so there is a subgroup of order dd" feels like a restatement and is not, and the counterexample has order 1212 — small enough to be asked about directly.

The idea

A subgroup H≤GH \le G is a non-empty subset closed under the operation and inverses. For finite HH, closure alone suffices.

The left cosets gHgH partition GG, and each has ∣H∣|H| elements. Counting gives

∣G∣=[G:H] ∣H∣(Lagrange),|G| = [G:H]\,|H| \qquad \text{(Lagrange)},

where [G:H][G:H] is the number of cosets. Two consequences used constantly:

  • The order of any element divides ∣G∣|G|, since ⟨g⟩\langle g\rangle is a subgroup.
  • g∣G∣=eg^{|G|} = e for every gg. Applied to (Z/n)×(\mathbb{Z}/n)^\times this is Euler's theorem, and with nn prime it is Fermat's little theorem.

The converse fails

C₁₂ — one subgroup per divisor 12 6 4 3 2 1 every divisor of 12 is the order of exactly one subgroup — the converse holds here A₄, also order 12 12 6 ✗ 4 3 2 1 6 divides 12 and there is no subgroup of order 6. Lagrange runs one way only.
Two groups of order 12. The cyclic one has a subgroup of every divisor order; A₄ has no subgroup of order 6, so Lagrange's converse is false in general and true for cyclic groups.

∣A4∣=12|A_4| = 12 and 6∣126 \mid 12, and A4A_4 has no subgroup of order 6.

The argument is worth carrying because it is short. A subgroup of order 66 would have index 22, hence be normal, hence contain every square. But every 33-cycle in A4A_4 is a square — (a b c)=(a c b)2(a\,b\,c) = (a\,c\,b)^2 — and there are eight of them, which already exceeds 66.

What is true in that direction:

  • Cauchy: if a prime pp divides ∣G∣|G|, then GG has an element of order pp. So subgroups of prime order always exist.
  • Sylow: if pkp^k is the largest power of pp dividing ∣G∣|G|, a subgroup of order pkp^k exists.
  • For cyclic groups the converse holds fully: CnC_n has exactly one subgroup of order dd for every d∣nd \mid n, and no others.

So 66 fails in A4A_4 specifically because 66 is neither a prime nor a prime power, and A4A_4 is not cyclic.

Cyclic groups

G=⟨g⟩G = \langle g\rangle is cyclic. Every cyclic group is Z\mathbb{Z} or Cn≅Z/nC_n \cong \mathbb{Z}/n.

  • Every subgroup of a cyclic group is cyclic.
  • CnC_n has exactly one subgroup of order dd for each d∣nd \mid n, generated by gn/dg^{n/d}.
  • gkg^k generates CnC_n exactly when gcd⁡(k,n)=1\gcd(k,n) = 1, so there are φ(n)\varphi(n) generators.
  • The order of gkg^k is n/gcd⁡(k,n)n/\gcd(k,n).

Every group of prime order is cyclic, by Lagrange: any non-identity element generates a subgroup of order dividing pp and bigger than 11.

Small orders

  • Order pp: cyclic, one group.
  • Order p2p^2: abelian, so Cp2C_{p^2} or Cp×CpC_p\times C_p.
  • Order 44: C4C_4 or the Klein four-group VV. Not every group of order 44 is cyclic, and VV is the standard reminder.
  • Order 66: C6C_6 or S3S_3. The smallest non-abelian group is S3S_3.

Where intuition breaks

"dd divides ∣G∣|G|, so GG has a subgroup of order dd." A4A_4 and d=6d = 6. The single most examined false statement in algebra. Tempting because Lagrange reads like an equivalence and because it is one for cyclic groups.

"GG has order nn and gn=eg^n = e, so gg has order nn." gn=eg^n = e holds for every element by Lagrange. The order is the least such exponent.

"Every group of order 4 is cyclic." The Klein four-group. Every group of order p2p^2 is abelian, which is weaker than cyclic.

"HKHK is a subgroup whenever HH and KK are." Only when HK=KHHK = KH. In S3S_3, ⟨(1 2)⟩⟨(1 3)⟩\langle(1\,2)\rangle\langle(1\,3)\rangle has four elements, which does not divide 66, so it cannot be a subgroup.

"A subgroup of index 2 might not be normal." Index 22 always gives normality — the two left cosets and the two right cosets are both {H,G∖H}\{H, G\setminus H\}. Worth knowing as a true statement, since it appears among false ones.

"The intersection of two subgroups can fail to be a subgroup." Intersections are always subgroups; unions are the ones that fail, unless one contains the other.

"Cauchy gives a subgroup of order dd for every dd." For every prime dd dividing ∣G∣|G|. Sylow extends it to prime powers, and nothing extends it to 66.

The exam's angle

  1. When an option asserts a subgroup of order dd exists, check whether dd is a prime power. If it is, Cauchy or Sylow gives it. If not, suspect A4A_4.
  2. Check whether the group is cyclic first. In a cyclic group every divisor question has the obvious answer, and the paper often supplies Z/n\mathbb{Z}/n to see whether you notice.
  3. Use orders of elements to rule things out. A group with an element of order nn and size nn is cyclic; a group where every non-identity element has order 22 is elementary abelian.
  4. Count. Coset counting settles more of this topic than any structural argument, and the A4A_4 proof is itself a count.
  5. For "how many generators", it is φ(n)\varphi(n), and for "how many subgroups of order dd" in a cyclic group, exactly one.

The night before

  • Lagrange: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣|G| = [G:H]|H|. Order of an element divides ∣G∣|G|; g∣G∣=eg^{|G|} = e.
  • The converse is false: A4A_4 has order 1212 and no subgroup of order 66.
  • Cauchy: prime p∣∣G∣p \mid |G| ⇒\Rightarrow an element of order pp. Sylow: a subgroup of order pkp^k for the largest such power.
  • Cyclic groups: converse of Lagrange holds, exactly one subgroup per divisor, all subgroups cyclic.
  • gkg^k generates CnC_n   ⟺  gcd⁡(k,n)=1\iff \gcd(k,n)=1; there are φ(n)\varphi(n) generators; gkg^k has order n/gcd⁡(k,n)n/\gcd(k,n).
  • Prime order ⇒\Rightarrow cyclic. Order p2p^2 ⇒\Rightarrow abelian, not necessarily cyclic.
  • HKHK is a subgroup   ⟺  HK=KH\iff HK = KH. Intersections always are; unions almost never.
  • Index 22 ⇒\Rightarrow normal.

See it move

Lagrange's theorem and its false converseinteractive

This visual is part of Trap Analysis

Order divides — but a divisor need not give a subgroup, and A₄ is the reason.

Unlock interactive visuals

The trap here

“If d divides |G| then G has a subgroup of order d” — false

A4A_{4} has order 12 but no subgroup of order 6

More on this →

Check yourself

Let G be any finite group. Which one of the following is necessarily true?

More in Groups

Take it further

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

Next: Normal subgroups, quotients, isomorphism theorems

Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram

Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 2