Subgroups, cosets, Lagrange, cyclic groups
Why this is asked: Lagrange gives one direction only. The exam tests the failures: no subgroup of a given order (A₄), and 'union of proper subgroups ⇔ not cyclic'.
In one sentence
Lagrange says the order of a subgroup divides the order of the group, the converse is false, and having no subgroup of order is the fact the whole topic is built to test.
Why the exam asks it
Because Lagrange is the first real theorem in group theory and its converse is the first real trap. " divides , so there is a subgroup of order " feels like a restatement and is not, and the counterexample has order — small enough to be asked about directly.
The idea
A subgroup is a non-empty subset closed under the operation and inverses. For finite , closure alone suffices.
The left cosets partition , and each has elements. Counting gives
where is the number of cosets. Two consequences used constantly:
- The order of any element divides , since is a subgroup.
- for every . Applied to this is Euler's theorem, and with prime it is Fermat's little theorem.
The converse fails
and , and has no subgroup of order 6.
The argument is worth carrying because it is short. A subgroup of order would have index , hence be normal, hence contain every square. But every -cycle in is a square — — and there are eight of them, which already exceeds .
What is true in that direction:
- Cauchy: if a prime divides , then has an element of order . So subgroups of prime order always exist.
- Sylow: if is the largest power of dividing , a subgroup of order exists.
- For cyclic groups the converse holds fully: has exactly one subgroup of order for every , and no others.
So fails in specifically because is neither a prime nor a prime power, and is not cyclic.
Cyclic groups
is cyclic. Every cyclic group is or .
- Every subgroup of a cyclic group is cyclic.
- has exactly one subgroup of order for each , generated by .
- generates exactly when , so there are generators.
- The order of is .
Every group of prime order is cyclic, by Lagrange: any non-identity element generates a subgroup of order dividing and bigger than .
Small orders
- Order : cyclic, one group.
- Order : abelian, so or .
- Order : or the Klein four-group . Not every group of order is cyclic, and is the standard reminder.
- Order : or . The smallest non-abelian group is .
Where intuition breaks
" divides , so has a subgroup of order ." and . The single most examined false statement in algebra. Tempting because Lagrange reads like an equivalence and because it is one for cyclic groups.
" has order and , so has order ." holds for every element by Lagrange. The order is the least such exponent.
"Every group of order 4 is cyclic." The Klein four-group. Every group of order is abelian, which is weaker than cyclic.
" is a subgroup whenever and are." Only when . In , has four elements, which does not divide , so it cannot be a subgroup.
"A subgroup of index 2 might not be normal." Index always gives normality — the two left cosets and the two right cosets are both . Worth knowing as a true statement, since it appears among false ones.
"The intersection of two subgroups can fail to be a subgroup." Intersections are always subgroups; unions are the ones that fail, unless one contains the other.
"Cauchy gives a subgroup of order for every ." For every prime dividing . Sylow extends it to prime powers, and nothing extends it to .
The exam's angle
- When an option asserts a subgroup of order exists, check whether is a prime power. If it is, Cauchy or Sylow gives it. If not, suspect .
- Check whether the group is cyclic first. In a cyclic group every divisor question has the obvious answer, and the paper often supplies to see whether you notice.
- Use orders of elements to rule things out. A group with an element of order and size is cyclic; a group where every non-identity element has order is elementary abelian.
- Count. Coset counting settles more of this topic than any structural argument, and the proof is itself a count.
- For "how many generators", it is , and for "how many subgroups of order " in a cyclic group, exactly one.
The night before
- Lagrange: . Order of an element divides ; .
- The converse is false: has order and no subgroup of order .
- Cauchy: prime an element of order . Sylow: a subgroup of order for the largest such power.
- Cyclic groups: converse of Lagrange holds, exactly one subgroup per divisor, all subgroups cyclic.
- generates ; there are generators; has order .
- Prime order cyclic. Order abelian, not necessarily cyclic.
- is a subgroup . Intersections always are; unions almost never.
- Index normal.
See it move
The trap here
“If d divides |G| then G has a subgroup of order d” — false
has order 12 but no subgroup of order 6
Check yourself
Let G be any finite group. Which one of the following is necessarily true?
More in Groups
Take it further
- The mistake this prevents: property not inherited → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- The mistake this prevents: standard counterexample → real wrong options, and why each one tempts
- Previous-year questions set on this — every option and the answer, free:June 2025 · Part BDecember 2025 · Part BDecember 2025 · Part BJune 2024 · Part BDecember 2024 · Part BDecember 2024 · Part BDecember 2024 · Part CDecember 2023 · Part B
Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.
Next: Normal subgroups, quotients, isomorphism theorems
Create a free account to keep your place and have this feed your study plan.
Open this in the full syllabus view · Unit 2