Skip to content
Part CCSIR NET June 2024umvue-need-not-attain-the-bound

Umvue need not attain the bound

Let X1,…,Xn(n≥3)X_{1}, \dots, X_{n} (n \ge 3) be a random sample from a distribution having probability density function f(x | θ)=θe(−θx)\theta) = \theta{}e^(-\theta{}x) if x > 0, and 0 otherwise, where θ>0\theta > 0 is an unknown parameter. Let Tn=(1/n)∑iT_{n} = (1/n)\sum_{i}₌1nXi_{1}^{n}X_{i}. Which of the following statements are true?

  1. A.Uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator of θ\theta is (n − 1)/(nTn)_{n})✓ Correct
  2. B.Cramer-Rao lower bound for the variance of any unbiased estimator of θ\theta is θ2/n\theta^{2}/n✓ Correct
  3. C.Uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator of θ\theta attains the Cramer-Rao lower bound
  4. D.(1−e(−1/Tn))(1 - e^(-1/T_{n})) is a consistent estimator of Pθ(X1≤1)P_\theta(X_{1} \le 1)✓ Correct

You have the answer. Trap Analysis is why the other three were written.

Not a worked solution repeated four times — the specific reasoning error each wrong option was built to reward, and why this one tests what the inference means.

See pricing

50 are analysed free — try those first.

The trap it tests

What the inference means

p-values, size, power and error types say specific things. This was not one of them.

Drill statements like this

Related counterexample: A sufficient statistic is complete

More on this topic

The chapter behind this: Sufficiency, completeness and the UMVUE machine — free to read

From Estimation › Sufficiency, completeness, UMVUE, Cramér–Rao

Last revised . Found a mistake? Tell us — corrections are the fastest thing we act on.

ShareWhatsAppTelegram