Suppose we want to estimate the population mean Ȳ of a variable for a finite population of size 85, with 34 Statisticians and 51 Biologists. We consider the following sampling scheme: a stratified random sample with 2 strata of Statisticians (Stratum-1) and Biologists (Stratum-2), where 12 Statisticians and 15 Biologists are drawn from Stratum-1 and Stratum-2, respectively, using SRSWOR scheme. Denote ȳ_S, ȳ_B, and ȳ as the mean of the variable among the Statistician sample, Biologist sample, and the combined sample, respectively. Which of the following is an unbiased estimator of Ȳ?
Part BCSIR NET June 2025stratum-weights-come-from-the-population-sizes-and-the-allocation-here-is-not-proportional
Stratum weights come from the population sizes and the allocation here is not proportional
Related counterexample: Systematic sampling is always at least as efficient as SRS
- Part C questionDecember 2023
- pooled variance formulaDecember 2023
- two draws cannot contain three unitsDecember 2024
- invert the bias factor not the varianceDecember 2024
- linearity over indicatorsJune 2024
The chapter behind this: Sampling designs — free to read
From Sampling and Design of Experiments › SRS, stratified and systematic sampling